From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jamal Hadi Salim Subject: Re: [patch net-next v2 01/10] net: rename netdev_phys_port_id to more generic name Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:03:05 -0500 Message-ID: <54610BE9.5010106@mojatatu.com> References: <54603270.509@mojatatu.com> <20141110074344.GB1850@nanopsycho.orion> <5460ACC0.3020805@mojatatu.com> <20141110.112857.1873381550982989519.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: jiri@resnulli.us, "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , nhorman@tuxdriver.com, andy@greyhouse.net, tgraf@suug.ch, dborkman@redhat.com, ogerlitz@mellanox.com, jesse@nicira.com, pshelar@nicira.com, azhou@nicira.com, ben@decadent.org.uk, stephen@networkplumber.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, vyasevic@redhat.com, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, john.r.fastabend@intel.com, edumazet@google.com, sfeldma@gmail.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com, linville@tuxdriver.com, jasowang@redhat.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com, ryazanov.s.a@gmail.com, buytenh@wantstofly.org, aviadr@mellanox.com, nbd@openwrt.org, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com, Neil.Jerram@metaswitch.com, ronye@mellanox.com, simon.horman@netronome.com, alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com, john.ronciak@intel.com, mleitner@redhat.com, shrijeet@gmail.com, gospo@cumulusnetworks.com, bc To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-ie0-f179.google.com ([209.85.223.179]:44674 "EHLO mail-ie0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751010AbaKJTDi (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:03:38 -0500 Received: by mail-ie0-f179.google.com with SMTP id rl12so9920044iec.38 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:03:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20141110.112857.1873381550982989519.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 11/10/14 11:28, David Miller wrote: > From: Jamal Hadi Salim > > Jamal, this is really driving me crazy, this is a non-issue. > You are right Dave it is a non-issue, I am sorry. I was still humping on the wrong tree on the attribute size change. But please let us have the discussion so the right thing can happen. I am not trying to beat up on Jiri. I actually think he is doing the right thing; we just need to make sure input from other people is taken into consideration because they have implemented on real devices. cheers, jamal