From: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
To: Efill <efill@me.com>
Cc: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: (Intel Wireless 7260) + 5G + AP mode
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:22:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5461F165.1010801@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fd333f5e-227c-4c48-a8ba-14102e26599d@me.com>
On 11-11-14 11:54, Efill wrote:
> >>>>>> I’m trying to get the 7260 to act as an AP on the 5G band. Unfortunately
> it seems to be impossible due to the „no IR“ reg domain restriction done by the
> Intel >firmware internally (this is what I’ve googled so far..).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Could someone explain to me the technical background of this. As far as
> I understood the regulation if DFS and TPC are used, most of the 5G channels are
> allowed. >Did I miss something? What’s the point of restricting the IR then?
> >>>>
> >>>> This is not true world wide. With the devices currently available, you
> >>>> can't have IR in 5GHz.
> >>>>
> >>
> >> Even so I don't want to teach you wrong, a quick look at wikipedia reveals a
> slightly different view on this:
> >>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_WLAN_channels#5.C2.A0GHz_.28802.11a.2Fh.2Fj.2Fn.2Fac.29.5B17.5D
>
> >>
> >> I mean that's exactly what's the linux kernel reg domain stuff (
> http://wireless.kernel.org/en/developers/Regulatory/processing_rules ) is meant
> to manage, isn't it?
> >>
> >>> Let me clarify, with *Intel* devices currently available, you will not
> >>> be able to have IR in 5GHz.
> >>
> >> That's the reason I wrote the mail in the first place. I wasn't able to use
> AP mode at 5G. Wich I found out by myself and didn't read somewhere e.g. at
> http://>wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/iwlwifi . If it's that clear and
> obvious, why not state it there? I would have saved me 50 Euros and some hours...
> >>
> >> Just a feeling, but I guess asking something like "Why?" wouldn't help me in
> understanding, right? This is just some marketing decision at Intel (don't
> support 5G AP >mode in consumer WiFi cards) developers have to follow.
> >>
> >>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> And finally: Is there a way to get it work? Some other PCI-E chip? ath10k?
> >>
> >> Does anyone have a working setup for 5G AP mode with linux using a
> (m)PCI(-e) card? Or are there only SoCs available for this job?
> >
> > Well, I have although I would have no idea where you could buy it. As
> > you may guess it is a Broadcom device and comes with my job.
>
> Dear Arend,
>
> thanks for acknowledging that at least it's possible ;-) Do you mind releasing
> slightly more information on this? Which chip, connectivity, packaging etc. I've
> tried the Broadcom BCM4360 but had to learn that this one is lacking AP mode
> completely...
Currently, I am using BCM4354 and BCM43602. The BCM4360 is a softmac
device and the Broadcom wl driver might indeed lack AP support.
Regards,
Arend
> Another question: Did someone had luck getting an Atheros QCA9880 V2 to work as
> an 802.11ac 5G AP?
>
>
> Best,
> Efill
>
>
next parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-11 11:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <fd333f5e-227c-4c48-a8ba-14102e26599d@me.com>
2014-11-11 11:22 ` Arend van Spriel [this message]
2014-11-10 21:31 (Intel Wireless 7260) + 5G + AP mode Efill
2014-11-11 10:04 ` Arend van Spriel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5461F165.1010801@broadcom.com \
--to=arend@broadcom.com \
--cc=efill@me.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.