From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 4CDDDE00874; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 10:53:33 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from smtp.webfaction.com (mail6.webfaction.com [74.55.86.74]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78BA5E0072A for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 10:53:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (unknown [68.38.40.177]) by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F4B5207CADB; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 18:53:30 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <54625B29.6020508@mindchasers.com> Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 13:53:29 -0500 From: Bob Cochran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Otavio Salvador References: <1414789533-29004-1-git-send-email-yocto@mindchasers.com> <5453FD56.8040009@mindchasers.com> <54614DE8.8090604@mindchasers.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-ppc][PATCH] linux-qoriq: Remove Altivec from T1040 64-bit defconfig X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 18:53:33 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/11/2014 06:02 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Hello Bob, > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Bob Cochran wrote: >> Please guide me on how I should submit multiple kernel patches for >> linux-qoriq that also require multiple SRC_URI line additions to the same >> linux-qoriq_3.12.bb file in the meta-fsl-ppc layer. > > This is my opinion, so wait Zhenhua to comment on this as well... > > I think it is better to: > > * Have one commit for each patch which detailed explain the issue and > includes the: > > . kernel patch file (with Upstream-Status: Pending) > . modification for .bb to include it > Thanks for the reply Otavio. So if I want to send multiple patches (each patch is a separate email that includes both the kernel patch & a patch for linux-qoriq_3.12.bb), then each patch of linux-qoriq_3.12.bb will depend on any of my previously submitted patches, right? In other words, the SRC_URI in the linux-qoriq_3.12.bb patch will show my prior kernel patch submissions regardless of whether they have been merged / approved. Example: (assume that "configure-T1040-for-FMAN-3VL.patch" was previously submitted but not yet approved / merged) - ... file://Fix-CVE-2014-5077-sctp-inherit-auth-capable-on-INIT-collisions.patch \ file://Fix-CVE-2014-5471_CVE-2014-5472.patch \ file://configure-T1040-for-FMAN-V3L.patch \ +file://remove-Altivec-from-T1040-64-bit-defconfig.patch \ " SRCREV = "c29fe1a733308cbe592b3af054a97be1b91cf2dd"