Re: [PATCH 0/4] move pci_assivned_vfs() check (while disabling VFs) to pci sub-system

[Don Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>]

On 11/10/2014 06:53 AM, Sathya Perla wrote:
> A user must not be allowed to disable VFs while they are already assigned to
> a guest. This check is being made in each individual driver that implements
> the sriov_configure PCI method.
> This patch-set fixes this code duplication by moving this check from
> drivers to the sriov_nuvfs_store() routine just before invoking
> sriov_configure() when num_vfs is equal to 0.
>
> Vasundhara Volam (4):
>    pci: move pci_assivned_vfs() check while disabling VFs to pci
>      sub-system
>    bnx2x: remove pci_assigned_vfs() check while disabling VFs
>    i40e: remove pci_assigned_vfs() check while disabling VFs
>    qlcnic: remove pci_assigned_vfs() check while disabling VFs
>
>   drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_sriov.c  |    2 +-
>   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_virtchnl_pf.c |    7 +------
>   .../net/ethernet/qlogic/qlcnic/qlcnic_sriov_pf.c   |   10 ----------
>   drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c                            |    5 +++++
>   4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
I have had a side conversation with Alex Williamson, VFIO author.

VFIO is the upstream method that device-assignment is managed/handled on kvm now.
It does not set the PCI_DEV_FLAGS_ASSIGNED pci dev-flags, and thus,
this check will not work when VFIO is used.

This patch set will only work for the former, kvm-managed, device-assignment method,
which is currently being deprecated in qemu as well.

So, yes, it works for kvm managed device-assignment, but not the
newer, VFIO-based device-assignment.

Note, also, that the pci_assigned_vfs() check in the drivers will
always return 0 when VFIO is used for device assignment, so keeping
these checks in the drivers doesn't do what they imply either.

So, taking in the patch solves old, kvm-managed, device assignment,
but a new method is needed when VFIO is involved.

- Don

ps -- Note: just adding the flag setting in vfio-pci does not necessarily
       solve this problem.  VFIO does not know if a device is assigned to a guest;
       it only knows a caller of the ioctl requesting the device to be assigned
       to vfio, and to be dma-mapped for a region of memory, has been requested.
       So, a new PF<->VF mechanism needs to be put in place to
       determine the equivalent information.