From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 4A577E008CA; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 18:06:56 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [134.170.132.63 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] X-Greylist: delayed 69915 seconds by postgrey-1.32 at yocto-www; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 18:06:38 PST Received: from APAC01-SG1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-sg1on0063.outbound.protection.outlook.com [134.170.132.63]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95288E007C0 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 18:06:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.5.3] (220.233.218.62) by SINPR02MB187.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.141.112.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.16.15; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 02:06:34 +0000 Message-ID: <5462C0A4.7010506@beamcommunications.com> Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 13:06:28 +1100 From: Craig McQueen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Otavio Salvador References: <5461AF84.2000700@beamcommunications.com> <5462951C.5000701@beamcommunications.com> In-Reply-To: X-Originating-IP: [220.233.218.62] X-ClientProxiedBy: SIXPR02CA023.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.141.119.18) To SINPR02MB187.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.141.112.25) X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:; X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:SINPR02MB187; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:SINPR02MB187; X-Forefront-PRVS: 03932714EB X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6049001)(6009001)(189002)(199003)(51704005)(377454003)(479174003)(24454002)(19580395003)(19580405001)(65816999)(120916001)(107046002)(92726001)(92566001)(99396003)(110136001)(76176999)(36756003)(50986999)(101416001)(87266999)(97736003)(54356999)(46102003)(40100003)(42186005)(77096003)(62966003)(77156002)(50466002)(86362001)(4396001)(21056001)(64126003)(80316001)(122386002)(31966008)(59896002)(87976001)(93886004)(23746002)(33656002)(65806001)(47776003)(66066001)(106356001)(64706001)(95666004)(20776003)(117156001)(65956001)(102836001)(105586002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:SINPR02MB187; H:[192.168.5.3]; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:SINPR02MB187; X-OriginatorOrg: beamcommunications.com Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: CLOCAL bit for console ttyAMA0 on imx28evk with 3.14 kernel X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 02:06:56 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/11/14 10:47, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Craig McQueen > wrote: >> On 12/11/14 04:53, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote: >>>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Otavio Salvador >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Is it something which needs fixing on the kernel or Busybox getty? >>>> It needs to be fixed in Busybox. I tried the same on an LTIB rootfs >>>> and the problem does not happen there. >>> Please see if you can identify the option (or patch) we need to apply >>> in Busybox to solve it. >>> >>> Another possibility is something on your testing LTIB rootfs to be >>> adding a stty call somewhere. >>> >> I tried adding the -L option to the getty line in /etc/inittab: >> >> AMA0:12345:respawn:/sbin/getty -L 115200 ttyAMA0 >> >> That seemed to work. Not sure yet how to patch that in meta-freescale. > I prepared the patches for OE-Core. I attached both here so you can > confirm it works for you. > > If it does, I can add your Reported-by and Tested-by credits :) > Great! I have tested the inittab patch, and it works. Thanks. I haven't tested the systemd patch. -- Craig McQueen