From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <54633C3D.1090503@sigmatek.at>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 11:53:49 +0100
From: Johann Obermayr <johann.obermayr@sigmatek.at>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <54631EB1.1050900@sigmatek.at> <546323F9.9040608@xenomai.org>
 <5463264B.3090503@sigmatek.at> <54632D7C.5020409@xenomai.org>
In-Reply-To: <54632D7C.5020409@xenomai.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Xenomai] rtdm_nrtsig_pend FAQ
Reply-To: johann.obermayr@sigmatek.at
List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project <xenomai.xenomai.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/options/xenomai>,
 <mailto:xenomai-request@xenomai.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai/>
List-Post: <mailto:xenomai@xenomai.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xenomai-request@xenomai.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai>,
 <mailto:xenomai-request@xenomai.org?subject=subscribe>
To: xenomai@xenomai.org

Am 12.11.2014 um 10:50 schrieb Philippe Gerum:
> On 11/12/2014 10:20 AM, Johann Obermayr wrote:
>> Am 12.11.2014 um 10:10 schrieb Philippe Gerum:
>>> nrt signals are based on I-pipe virtual irqs, which do not pile up:
>>> there is a single signal pending until the irq can be delivered to the
>>> handler, regardless of how many times it has been triggered.
>> i know, if there is a big cpu load some virtual irqs can be lost, but we
>> have cpu load smaller that 10 percent.
>>
> Did you try running vmstat with a one second delay while your
> application runs?
>
vmstat is not running.
we have a own proc_create("company/lrtdrv_timing", 0, NULL, &proc_fops); 
to show
the counters.