From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 1D45EE00903; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 09:07:44 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from smtp.webfaction.com (mail6.webfaction.com [74.55.86.74]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10893E00777 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 09:07:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (unknown [68.38.40.177]) by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB2172078CC6; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 17:07:35 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <546393D6.8080902@mindchasers.com> Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 12:07:34 -0500 From: Bob Cochran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "zhenhua.luo@freescale.com" , Otavio Salvador References: <1414789533-29004-1-git-send-email-yocto@mindchasers.com> <5453FD56.8040009@mindchasers.com> <54614DE8.8090604@mindchasers.com> <54625B29.6020508@mindchasers.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-ppc][PATCH] linux-qoriq: Remove Altivec from T1040 64-bit defconfig X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 17:07:44 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/12/2014 07:06 AM, zhenhua.luo@freescale.com wrote: > Bob, > > I agree with Otavio's suggestion. Thank you Otavio and Zhenhua. Look for two patch resends today or tomorrow for what I already sent up but didn't include the linux-qoriq recipe patch. I'm sure you'll let me know if it's not what you're expecting. If they're acceptable, then I'll start submitting new patches. Bob > > > Best Regards, > > Zhenhua > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Bob Cochran [mailto:yocto@mindchasers.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 2:53 AM >> To: Otavio Salvador >> Cc: Luo Zhenhua-B19537; meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org >> Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-ppc][PATCH] linux-qoriq: Remove >> Altivec from T1040 64-bit defconfig >> >> On 11/11/2014 06:02 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>> Hello Bob, >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Bob Cochran >> wrote: >>>> Please guide me on how I should submit multiple kernel patches for >>>> linux-qoriq that also require multiple SRC_URI line additions to the >>>> same linux-qoriq_3.12.bb file in the meta-fsl-ppc layer. >>> >>> This is my opinion, so wait Zhenhua to comment on this as well... >>> >>> I think it is better to: >>> >>> * Have one commit for each patch which detailed explain the issue and >>> includes the: >>> >>> . kernel patch file (with Upstream-Status: Pending) >>> . modification for .bb to include it >>> >> >> >> Thanks for the reply Otavio. >> >> So if I want to send multiple patches (each patch is a separate email that >> includes both the kernel patch & a patch for linux-qoriq_3.12.bb), then each >> patch of linux-qoriq_3.12.bb will depend on any of my previously submitted >> patches, right? >> >> In other words, the SRC_URI in the linux-qoriq_3.12.bb patch will show my >> prior kernel patch submissions regardless of whether they have been merged / >> approved. >> >> Example: (assume that "configure-T1040-for-FMAN-3VL.patch" was previously >> submitted but not yet approved / merged) - >> >> >> ... >> >> file://Fix-CVE-2014-5077-sctp-inherit-auth-capable-on-INIT-collisions.patch >> \ >> file://Fix-CVE-2014-5471_CVE-2014-5472.patch \ >> file://configure-T1040-for-FMAN-V3L.patch \ >> +file://remove-Altivec-from-T1040-64-bit-defconfig.patch \ >> " >> SRCREV = "c29fe1a733308cbe592b3af054a97be1b91cf2dd" >> >> >