Re: [PATCH 0/6] pull: almost working AddressSanitizer support

[Bernhard Voelker <mail@bernhard-voelker.de>]

On 11/12/2014 04:02 PM, Sami Kerola wrote:
> On 12 November 2014 14:25, Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 10:49:02PM +0000, Sami Kerola wrote:
>>>       printf(_("Setting up swapspace version %d, size = %s (%ju bytes)\n"),
>>>               version, strsz, sz);
>>> +     free(strsz);
>>
>>  free-before-exit, you know what I think about it, right? :)
> 
> Normally I would agree, but this case is bizarre. The mkswap will
> return 1 when compiled with clang -fsanitize=address without any
> message what is wrong. That's probably clang bug, which is a different
> topic all together. Adding the free() calls seems to make the
> immediate tests failure issue to go away, that is needed to automate
> sanitize. In case travis && address sanitation is not needed at all
> then these changes does not make sense.

In coreutils, we're using a macro IF_LINT as condition for such
free() calls, and for tools like Coverity, we're turning it on.

Have a nice day,
Berny