From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mikko Perttunen Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/12] NVIDIA Tegra memory controller and IOMMU support Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 12:40:40 +0200 Message-ID: <54648AA8.2020509@kapsi.fi> References: <1415871157-21968-1-git-send-email-thierry.reding@gmail.com> <1550140.Lb4KHPOqX1@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1550140.Lb4KHPOqX1@wuerfel> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Arnd Bergmann , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org Cc: Thierry Reding , Alexandre Courbot , Russell King , Stephen Warren , Catalin Marinas , Joerg Roedel , Will Deacon , linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, Olof Johansson , Mike Turquette , David Riley , Peter De Schrijver List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org On 11/13/2014 12:12 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 13 November 2014 10:32:25 Thierry Reding wrote: >> From: Thierry Reding >> >> This is the sixth installment in the Tegra IOMMU and memory controller >> support series. This version addresses the final outstanding comments from >> Olof about using proper Kconfig symbols to track the dependencies. It also >> splits up the driver into one part that implements the memory controller >> only and a second part that implements the SMMU. This plays nicely with >> the new Kconfig options introduced. >> >> Patch 1 is a preparatory patch that exposes the memory controller clock. >> >> Patches 2 and 3 is a pair of precursory patches needed to make this all >> work on 64-bit ARM in the future. >> >> The device tree binding for the Tegra memory controller is added in patch >> 4 and patch 5 is the bulk of the series that move the existing memory >> controller and IOMMU drivers into the new unified driver that supports >> Tegra30, Tegra114 and Tegra124. > > I just noticed that patch 5 has never made it into my inbox in any of the > submissions. Did it get filtered by the mailing list? I have received patch 5 just fine through linux-tegra. The patch is rather long though, so something filtering it wouldn't be that surprising. > > Arnd Mikko From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mikko.perttunen@kapsi.fi (Mikko Perttunen) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 12:40:40 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v7 00/12] NVIDIA Tegra memory controller and IOMMU support In-Reply-To: <1550140.Lb4KHPOqX1@wuerfel> References: <1415871157-21968-1-git-send-email-thierry.reding@gmail.com> <1550140.Lb4KHPOqX1@wuerfel> Message-ID: <54648AA8.2020509@kapsi.fi> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 11/13/2014 12:12 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 13 November 2014 10:32:25 Thierry Reding wrote: >> From: Thierry Reding >> >> This is the sixth installment in the Tegra IOMMU and memory controller >> support series. This version addresses the final outstanding comments from >> Olof about using proper Kconfig symbols to track the dependencies. It also >> splits up the driver into one part that implements the memory controller >> only and a second part that implements the SMMU. This plays nicely with >> the new Kconfig options introduced. >> >> Patch 1 is a preparatory patch that exposes the memory controller clock. >> >> Patches 2 and 3 is a pair of precursory patches needed to make this all >> work on 64-bit ARM in the future. >> >> The device tree binding for the Tegra memory controller is added in patch >> 4 and patch 5 is the bulk of the series that move the existing memory >> controller and IOMMU drivers into the new unified driver that supports >> Tegra30, Tegra114 and Tegra124. > > I just noticed that patch 5 has never made it into my inbox in any of the > submissions. Did it get filtered by the mailing list? I have received patch 5 just fine through linux-tegra. The patch is rather long though, so something filtering it wouldn't be that surprising. > > Arnd Mikko