From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: Clark Laughlin <clark.laughlin@linaro.org>,
Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar <pranavkumar@linaro.org>,
tim@xen.org, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com,
xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-4.5 4/4] xen: arm: Support the other 4 PCI buses on Xgene
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 10:30:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <546C713C.9030506@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1416392298.29243.18.camel@citrix.com>
On 19/11/2014 10:18, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-11-19 at 10:06 +0000, Julien Grall wrote:
>> Hi Ian,
>>
>> On 19/11/2014 09:56, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2014-11-18 at 17:15 +0000, Julien Grall wrote:
>>>>> + default:
>>>>> + /* Ignore unknown PCI busses */
>>>>
>>>> I would add a
>>>> printk("Ignoring PCI busses %s\n", dt_node_full_name(dev));
>>>>
>>>>> + ret = 0;
>>>>> + break;
>>>>
>>>> continue?
>>>
>>> Yes, that makes sense (probably the ret = is then unnecessary).
>>>
>>>> You can't assume the order of the PCI busses in the device tree.
>>>
>>> But, I don't understand what this has to do with using continue.
>>
>> The current xgene-storm DTS has the different PCI busses ordered. So as
>> soon as you don't find the PCI range, it means there is no more PCI busses.
>
> I don't think it does, the patch iterates over all of the buses, even
> ones we don't understand, we don't give up at the first one we don't
> grok.
Hrmm you are right. I don't know why I though the break were bound to
the loop and not the switch.
Sorry for the noise.
Regards,
--
Julien Grall
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-19 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-18 16:44 [PATCH 0/4 for-4.5] xen: arm: xgene bug fixes + support for McDivitt Ian Campbell
2014-11-18 16:44 ` [PATCH for-4.5 1/4] xen: arm: Add earlyprintk " Ian Campbell
2014-11-18 16:59 ` Julien Grall
2014-11-19 9:54 ` Ian Campbell
2014-11-19 10:02 ` Julien Grall
2014-11-18 16:44 ` [PATCH for-4.5 2/4] xen: arm: correct off by one in xgene-storm's map_one_mmio Ian Campbell
2014-11-18 17:01 ` Julien Grall
2014-11-19 9:54 ` Ian Campbell
2014-11-19 21:11 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-11-18 16:44 ` [PATCH for-4.5 3/4] xen: arm: correct specific mappings for PCIE0 on X-Gene Ian Campbell
2014-11-18 17:04 ` Julien Grall
2014-11-18 16:44 ` [PATCH for-4.5 4/4] xen: arm: Support the other 4 PCI buses on Xgene Ian Campbell
2014-11-18 17:15 ` Julien Grall
2014-11-19 9:56 ` Ian Campbell
2014-11-19 10:06 ` Julien Grall
2014-11-19 10:18 ` Ian Campbell
2014-11-19 10:30 ` Julien Grall [this message]
2014-11-18 16:51 ` [PATCH 0/4 for-4.5] xen: arm: xgene bug fixes + support for McDivitt Ian Campbell
2014-11-19 21:18 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-11-20 9:02 ` Ian Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=546C713C.9030506@linaro.org \
--to=julien.grall@linaro.org \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=clark.laughlin@linaro.org \
--cc=pranavkumar@linaro.org \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.