All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	kernel-build-reports@lists.linaro.org,
	Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: exynos boot falures in linux-next
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 18:06:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <546CCE2F.8030108@collabora.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMAWPa8D-oRp2yC=n+Rgw_wtwV4+Go0OQi62y3iGRYxi0sow+g@mail.gmail.com>

Hello Kevin,

On 11/19/2014 06:01 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm not sure what is the correct step in this case but I'm OK with
>>> reverting the patch until the Exynos DRM driver bug is fixed.
>>
>> I didn't have time to dig, but I'd rather someone track down the DRM
>> problem and fix that, since it was known to be working. I'm guessing
>> it's something simple that can be fixed before the merge window opens.
> 
> OK, so this DRM problem is turning out to be non-trivial, so I think
> the defconfig patch should be reverted until the DRM issue is sorted
> out.
> 
> Otherwise, we risk having boot failures in linux-next which may be
> hiding other problems.
> 
> Kevin
> 

Agreed with the config revert, so many issues with Exynos DRM in linux-next :(

Best regards,
Javier

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk (Javier Martinez Canillas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: exynos boot falures in linux-next
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 18:06:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <546CCE2F.8030108@collabora.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMAWPa8D-oRp2yC=n+Rgw_wtwV4+Go0OQi62y3iGRYxi0sow+g@mail.gmail.com>

Hello Kevin,

On 11/19/2014 06:01 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm not sure what is the correct step in this case but I'm OK with
>>> reverting the patch until the Exynos DRM driver bug is fixed.
>>
>> I didn't have time to dig, but I'd rather someone track down the DRM
>> problem and fix that, since it was known to be working. I'm guessing
>> it's something simple that can be fixed before the merge window opens.
> 
> OK, so this DRM problem is turning out to be non-trivial, so I think
> the defconfig patch should be reverted until the DRM issue is sorted
> out.
> 
> Otherwise, we risk having boot failures in linux-next which may be
> hiding other problems.
> 
> Kevin
> 

Agreed with the config revert, so many issues with Exynos DRM in linux-next :(

Best regards,
Javier

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-19 17:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <E1XqKYI-0000pQ-4b@ip-10-35-177-41.ec2.internal>
2014-11-17 15:57 ` exynos boot falures in linux-next (was: next boot: 94 boots: 79 pass, 13 fail, 2 untried (next-20141117)) Kevin Hilman
2014-11-17 16:57   ` exynos boot falures in linux-next Krzysztof Kozłowski
2014-11-17 16:57     ` Krzysztof Kozłowski
2014-11-17 22:24   ` Kevin Hilman
2014-11-17 22:24     ` Kevin Hilman
2014-11-17 23:25     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-11-17 23:25       ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-11-18  2:30       ` Inki Dae
2014-11-18  2:30         ` Inki Dae
2014-11-18  3:49       ` Kevin Hilman
2014-11-18  3:49         ` Kevin Hilman
2014-11-19 17:01         ` Kevin Hilman
2014-11-19 17:01           ` Kevin Hilman
2014-11-19 17:06           ` Javier Martinez Canillas [this message]
2014-11-19 17:06             ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-11-20  1:55             ` Kukjin Kim
2014-11-20  1:55               ` Kukjin Kim
2014-12-02  8:32               ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-12-02  8:32                 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
     [not found] ` <7h61ed4xm3.fsf@deeprootsystems.com>
2014-11-17 18:21   ` mirabox boot fails in linux-next (was: next boot: 94 boots: 79 pass, 13 fail, 2 untried (next-20141117)) Thomas Petazzoni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=546CCE2F.8030108@collabora.co.uk \
    --to=javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=kernel-build-reports@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=khilman@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.