From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Javier Martinez Canillas Subject: Re: exynos boot falures in linux-next Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 18:06:55 +0100 Message-ID: <546CCE2F.8030108@collabora.co.uk> References: <7hoas54y7k.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> <7hlhn9zcse.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> <546A83D6.9060504@collabora.co.uk> <7hfvdhyxqi.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk ([93.93.135.160]:60014 "EHLO bhuna.collabora.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753980AbaKSRHC (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Nov 2014 12:07:02 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Kevin Hilman Cc: "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , kernel-build-reports@lists.linaro.org, Olof Johansson , Arnd Bergmann Hello Kevin, On 11/19/2014 06:01 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: >>> >>> I'm not sure what is the correct step in this case but I'm OK with >>> reverting the patch until the Exynos DRM driver bug is fixed. >> >> I didn't have time to dig, but I'd rather someone track down the DRM >> problem and fix that, since it was known to be working. I'm guessing >> it's something simple that can be fixed before the merge window opens. > > OK, so this DRM problem is turning out to be non-trivial, so I think > the defconfig patch should be reverted until the DRM issue is sorted > out. > > Otherwise, we risk having boot failures in linux-next which may be > hiding other problems. > > Kevin > Agreed with the config revert, so many issues with Exynos DRM in linux-next :( Best regards, Javier From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk (Javier Martinez Canillas) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 18:06:55 +0100 Subject: exynos boot falures in linux-next In-Reply-To: References: <7hoas54y7k.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> <7hlhn9zcse.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> <546A83D6.9060504@collabora.co.uk> <7hfvdhyxqi.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> Message-ID: <546CCE2F.8030108@collabora.co.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello Kevin, On 11/19/2014 06:01 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: >>> >>> I'm not sure what is the correct step in this case but I'm OK with >>> reverting the patch until the Exynos DRM driver bug is fixed. >> >> I didn't have time to dig, but I'd rather someone track down the DRM >> problem and fix that, since it was known to be working. I'm guessing >> it's something simple that can be fixed before the merge window opens. > > OK, so this DRM problem is turning out to be non-trivial, so I think > the defconfig patch should be reverted until the DRM issue is sorted > out. > > Otherwise, we risk having boot failures in linux-next which may be > hiding other problems. > > Kevin > Agreed with the config revert, so many issues with Exynos DRM in linux-next :( Best regards, Javier