From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Javier Martinez Canillas Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: dts: Add SPI flash node for Peach boards Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 18:29:47 +0100 Message-ID: <546CD38B.3050700@collabora.co.uk> References: <1416246184-29071-1-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> <1416246184-29071-2-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> <546C6BD2.4020802@collabora.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk ([93.93.135.160]:60072 "EHLO bhuna.collabora.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755737AbaKSR3z (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Nov 2014 12:29:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Doug Anderson Cc: Kukjin Kim , Simon Glass , Olof Johansson , linux-samsung-soc , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Tomasz Figa , Mark Brown Hello Doug, On 11/19/2014 06:19 PM, Doug Anderson wrote: >> >> I wonder how the spidev user-space interface is supposed to be used >> when booting with Device Trees. > > OK. Please don't take my comments as a NAK on this patch. I should > have done the same grep myself before sending--sorry. I just > remembered the old conversation and looked for that instead. > Ok, let's see what others say. At the very least documentation about the spidev DT binding should be added to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ > If the convention is to use "spidev" like this then I guess we're OK. > I do wish it was a little more like "i2c" myself where you could get a > direct access interface no matter what driver was bound underneath > (and also if no drivers were bound underneath). ...but I could just > be naive. ;) > +1 > -Doug > Best regards, Javier From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk (Javier Martinez Canillas) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 18:29:47 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: dts: Add SPI flash node for Peach boards In-Reply-To: References: <1416246184-29071-1-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> <1416246184-29071-2-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> <546C6BD2.4020802@collabora.co.uk> Message-ID: <546CD38B.3050700@collabora.co.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello Doug, On 11/19/2014 06:19 PM, Doug Anderson wrote: >> >> I wonder how the spidev user-space interface is supposed to be used >> when booting with Device Trees. > > OK. Please don't take my comments as a NAK on this patch. I should > have done the same grep myself before sending--sorry. I just > remembered the old conversation and looked for that instead. > Ok, let's see what others say. At the very least documentation about the spidev DT binding should be added to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ > If the convention is to use "spidev" like this then I guess we're OK. > I do wish it was a little more like "i2c" myself where you could get a > direct access interface no matter what driver was bound underneath > (and also if no drivers were bound underneath). ...but I could just > be naive. ;) > +1 > -Doug > Best regards, Javier