All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>, davem@davemloft.net
Cc: linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: sctp: keep owned chunk in destructor_arg instead of skb->cb
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 03:02:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <546D59A8.4090704@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1416444888-12778-1-git-send-email-dborkman@redhat.com>

On 11/19/2014 07:54 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> It's just silly to hold the skb destructor argument around inside
> skb->cb[] as we currently do in SCTP.
> 
> Nowadays, we're sort of cheating on data accounting in the sense
> that due to commit 4c3a5bdae293 ("sctp: Don't charge for data in
> sndbuf again when transmitting packet"), we orphan the skb already
> in the SCTP output path, i.e. giving back charged data memory, and
> use a different destructor only to make sure the sk doesn't vanish
> on skb destruction time. Thus, cb[] is still valid here as we
> operate within the SCTP layer. (It's generally actually a big
> candidate for future rework, imho.)
> 
> However, storing the destructor in the cb[] can easily cause issues
> should an non sctp_packet_set_owner_w()'ed skb ever escape the SCTP
> layer, since cb[] may get overwritten by lower layers and thus can
> corrupt the chunk pointer. There are no such issues at present,
> but lets keep the chunk in destructor_arg, as this is the actual
> purpose for it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>

Good clean-up.

Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>

-vlad

> ---
>  v1->v2:
>   - Only reworded commit message to make it more clear
> 
>  net/sctp/socket.c | 12 ++++--------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
> index 2120292..85e0b65 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/socket.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ static inline void sctp_set_owner_w(struct sctp_chunk *chunk)
>  
>  	chunk->skb->destructor = sctp_wfree;
>  	/* Save the chunk pointer in skb for sctp_wfree to use later.  */
> -	*((struct sctp_chunk **)(chunk->skb->cb)) = chunk;
> +	skb_shinfo(chunk->skb)->destructor_arg = chunk;
>  
>  	asoc->sndbuf_used += SCTP_DATA_SNDSIZE(chunk) +
>  				sizeof(struct sk_buff) +
> @@ -6870,14 +6870,10 @@ static void sctp_wake_up_waiters(struct sock *sk,
>   */
>  static void sctp_wfree(struct sk_buff *skb)
>  {
> -	struct sctp_association *asoc;
> -	struct sctp_chunk *chunk;
> -	struct sock *sk;
> +	struct sctp_chunk *chunk = skb_shinfo(skb)->destructor_arg;
> +	struct sctp_association *asoc = chunk->asoc;
> +	struct sock *sk = asoc->base.sk;
>  
> -	/* Get the saved chunk pointer.  */
> -	chunk = *((struct sctp_chunk **)(skb->cb));
> -	asoc = chunk->asoc;
> -	sk = asoc->base.sk;
>  	asoc->sndbuf_used -= SCTP_DATA_SNDSIZE(chunk) +
>  				sizeof(struct sk_buff) +
>  				sizeof(struct sctp_chunk);
> 


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>, davem@davemloft.net
Cc: linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: sctp: keep owned chunk in destructor_arg instead of skb->cb
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 22:02:00 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <546D59A8.4090704@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1416444888-12778-1-git-send-email-dborkman@redhat.com>

On 11/19/2014 07:54 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> It's just silly to hold the skb destructor argument around inside
> skb->cb[] as we currently do in SCTP.
> 
> Nowadays, we're sort of cheating on data accounting in the sense
> that due to commit 4c3a5bdae293 ("sctp: Don't charge for data in
> sndbuf again when transmitting packet"), we orphan the skb already
> in the SCTP output path, i.e. giving back charged data memory, and
> use a different destructor only to make sure the sk doesn't vanish
> on skb destruction time. Thus, cb[] is still valid here as we
> operate within the SCTP layer. (It's generally actually a big
> candidate for future rework, imho.)
> 
> However, storing the destructor in the cb[] can easily cause issues
> should an non sctp_packet_set_owner_w()'ed skb ever escape the SCTP
> layer, since cb[] may get overwritten by lower layers and thus can
> corrupt the chunk pointer. There are no such issues at present,
> but lets keep the chunk in destructor_arg, as this is the actual
> purpose for it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>

Good clean-up.

Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>

-vlad

> ---
>  v1->v2:
>   - Only reworded commit message to make it more clear
> 
>  net/sctp/socket.c | 12 ++++--------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
> index 2120292..85e0b65 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/socket.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ static inline void sctp_set_owner_w(struct sctp_chunk *chunk)
>  
>  	chunk->skb->destructor = sctp_wfree;
>  	/* Save the chunk pointer in skb for sctp_wfree to use later.  */
> -	*((struct sctp_chunk **)(chunk->skb->cb)) = chunk;
> +	skb_shinfo(chunk->skb)->destructor_arg = chunk;
>  
>  	asoc->sndbuf_used += SCTP_DATA_SNDSIZE(chunk) +
>  				sizeof(struct sk_buff) +
> @@ -6870,14 +6870,10 @@ static void sctp_wake_up_waiters(struct sock *sk,
>   */
>  static void sctp_wfree(struct sk_buff *skb)
>  {
> -	struct sctp_association *asoc;
> -	struct sctp_chunk *chunk;
> -	struct sock *sk;
> +	struct sctp_chunk *chunk = skb_shinfo(skb)->destructor_arg;
> +	struct sctp_association *asoc = chunk->asoc;
> +	struct sock *sk = asoc->base.sk;
>  
> -	/* Get the saved chunk pointer.  */
> -	chunk = *((struct sctp_chunk **)(skb->cb));
> -	asoc = chunk->asoc;
> -	sk = asoc->base.sk;
>  	asoc->sndbuf_used -= SCTP_DATA_SNDSIZE(chunk) +
>  				sizeof(struct sk_buff) +
>  				sizeof(struct sctp_chunk);
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-20  3:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-20  0:54 [PATCH net-next v2] net: sctp: keep owned chunk in destructor_arg instead of skb->cb Daniel Borkmann
2014-11-20  0:54 ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-11-20  3:02 ` Vlad Yasevich [this message]
2014-11-20  3:02   ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-11-20 14:07 ` Neil Horman
2014-11-20 14:07   ` Neil Horman
2014-11-21 19:51 ` David Miller
2014-11-21 19:51   ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=546D59A8.4090704@gmail.com \
    --to=vyasevich@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dborkman@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.