From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-4.5] scripts/get_maintainer.pl:
 Correctly CC the maintainers
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 17:20:51 +0000
Message-ID: <546E22F3.40106@linaro.org>
References: <1416341031-6204-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@linaro.org>	
	<1416499682.14429.41.camel@citrix.com>
	<546E1389.1070304@linaro.org> <1416501018.20161.5.camel@citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39])
	by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <julien.grall@linaro.org>) id 1XrVPa-0004Ix-VK
	for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 17:20:55 +0000
Received: by mail-wg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id y19so4328686wgg.14
	for <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>;
	Thu, 20 Nov 2014 09:20:53 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1416501018.20161.5.camel@citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, Don Slutz <dslutz@verizon.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 11/20/2014 04:30 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-11-20 at 16:15 +0000, Julien Grall wrote:
>> Hi Ian,
>>
>> On 11/20/2014 04:08 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2014-11-18 at 20:03 +0000, Julien Grall wrote:
>>>> By default, the script get_maintainer.pl will remove duplicates email as soon
>>>> as it appends the list of maintainers of a new file, and therefore override
>>>> the role of the developper.
>>>>
>>>> On complex patch (see [1]), this will result to ommitting randomly some
>>>> maintainers.
>>>>
>>>> This could be fixed
>>>
>>> Are you proposing an alternative/better fix here? or describing what
>>> this patch does?
>>
>> Describing what the patch does.
> 
> Then I think you meant "This is fixed" or "This patches fixes this
> by ...".

Ok. I will fix it.

> 
>> By drawbacks I meant, if there is another bug in the script then we may
>> end up to cc too many people. Honestly I don't believe it's the case.
> 
> Sure, lets assume not.

I will drop this drawbacks.

Regards,

-- 
Julien Grall