From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net 1/2] drivers/net: Disable UFO through virtio
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 09:47:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <546E99A6.5090803@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141119091455.GA26036@redhat.com>
On 11/19/2014 05:14 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 06:27:12PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> > IPv6 does not allow fragmentation by routers, so there is no
>> > fragmentation ID in the fixed header. UFO for IPv6 requires the ID to
>> > be passed separately, but there is no provision for this in the virtio
>> > net protocol.
>> >
>> > Until recently our software implementation of UFO/IPv6 generated a new
>> > ID, but this was a bug. Now we will use ID=0 for any UFO/IPv6 packet
>> > passed through a tap, which is even worse.
>> >
>> > Unfortunately there is no distinction between UFO/IPv4 and v6
>> > features, so disable UFO on taps and virtio_net completely until we
>> > have a proper solution.
>> >
>> > We cannot depend on VM managers respecting the tap feature flags, so
>> > keep accepting UFO packets but log a warning the first time we do
>> > this.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
>> > Fixes: 916e4cf46d02 ("ipv6: reuse ip6_frag_id from ip6_ufo_append_data")
> There's something I don't understand here. I see:
>
> NETIF_F_UFO_BIT, /* ... UDPv4 fragmentation */
>
> this comment is wrong then?
Looks wrong, at least ufo6 depends check this bit in ip6_output.c
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-21 1:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-30 18:26 [PATCH v2 net 0/2] drivers/net,ipv6: Fix IPv6 fragment ID selection for virtio Ben Hutchings
2014-10-30 18:27 ` [PATCH v2 net 1/2] drivers/net: Disable UFO through virtio Ben Hutchings
2014-10-30 18:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-10-30 22:20 ` Ben Hutchings
2014-10-30 23:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-11-19 9:14 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-11-21 1:47 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2014-11-21 18:46 ` Ben Hutchings
2014-11-23 10:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-10-30 18:27 ` [PATCH v2 net 2/2] drivers/net,ipv6: Select IPv6 fragment idents for virtio UFO packets Ben Hutchings
2014-10-30 18:27 ` Ben Hutchings
2014-10-31 0:02 ` [PATCH v2 net 0/2] drivers/net,ipv6: Fix IPv6 fragment ID selection for virtio David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=546E99A6.5090803@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
--cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.