From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Boris Ostrovsky Subject: Re: [PATCH for-4.5 RFC] pygrub: Fix regression from c/s d1b93ea, attempt 2 Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 12:25:08 -0500 Message-ID: <546F7574.9020005@oracle.com> References: <1416237586-17785-1-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> <1416499238.14429.39.camel@citrix.com> <546E1206.5080403@citrix.com> <1416500123.20161.3.camel@citrix.com> <546E1ABB.6090308@oracle.com> <546F3EDD.3020006@citrix.com> <20141121170933.GB8314@laptop.dumpdata.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20141121170933.GB8314@laptop.dumpdata.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Andrew Cooper Cc: Wei Liu , Ian Jackson , Ian Campbell , Xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 11/21/2014 12:09 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 01:32:13PM +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> That does look plausibly like it would fix the issue. >> >> However, I can't help but feeing that this is hacking around a broken >> patch in the first place. > I cannot think of a reason you would ever feel that way! > > > We know that the existing patches work fine for a host of Fedora > families (15->21) (thought I need to double check that the testing framework > that we have is using pygrub and not pvgrub), SLESs and RHEL5s, and OL6s. > > The ones that I am worried about are the ExtLinux and such which > I didn't realize would use 'pygrub'. > > Thought I just remembered a bug with OL7 grub entries - that is if > you go in the interactive menu things broke down. Boris, do you > remember if that was fixed or just 'deferred'? The only bug that I remember that had to do pygrub and OL7 was the fact that pygrub cannot parse grubenv (and therefore it's not really OL7-specific). We decided not to fix it. -boris