From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>,
Rafael Aquini <aquini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipc,sem block sem_lock on sma->lock during sma initialization
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 18:03:53 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <546FC4D9.6010600@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141121124229.933a9b6ef9725a4032c95d45@linux-foundation.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 11/21/2014 03:42 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 15:29:27 -0500 Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 11/21/2014 03:09 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>> On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 14:52:26 -0500 Rik van Riel
>>> <riel@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> When manipulating just one semaphore with semop, sem_lock
>>>> only takes that single semaphore's lock. This creates a
>>>> problem during initialization of the semaphore array, when
>>>> the data structures used by sem_lock have not been set up
>>>> yet. The sma->lock is already held by newary, and we just
>>>> have to make sure everything else waits on that lock during
>>>> initialization.
>>>>
>>>> Luckily it is easy to make sem_lock wait on the sma->lock,
>>>> by pretending there is a complex operation in progress while
>>>> the sma is being initialized.
>>>>
>>>> The newary function already zeroes sma->complex_count before
>>>> unlocking the sma->lock.
>>>
>>> What are the runtime effects of the bug?
>>>
>>
>> NULL pointer dereference in spin_lock from sem_lock, if it is
>> called before sma->sem_base has been pointed somewhere valid.
>
> Help us out here. People need to use this description to work out
> which kernel versions need the patch and whether to backport the
> fix into their various kernels. Other people will be starting at
> this changelog wondering "will this fix the bug my customer has
> reported".
>
> Is there some bug report people can look at?
>
> What userspace actions trigger this bug?
The reason the bug took almost two years to get noticed is that
it takes one task doing a semop on a semaphore in an array that
is still getting instantiated by newary (getsem) from another
task.
In other words, if you try to use a semaphore array before
getsem returns, you can oops the task that calls semop.
It should not cause any damage to long-living kernel data
structures.
- --
All rights reversed
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUb8TZAAoJEM553pKExN6DzJUH/RYSovikk+36KH0uFQN44txj
ZkEM6BsT7I6W9zBiK4OCPpwYCr5gy2xsXH7bLzCgzRV/YmjLFdw20DhDfSo14GO/
1ByYcsUcsZ+lPJZ+g4IKi57VW4T+NLa1T4CoJ84+1QVGKYlpc7mlwc8suTGBhKvQ
5Eq1o1KOE9ZtAG5Go8OYH7frwalkrYE0YJbGN9PW0pUvZ7FilEiMJIkznIetRS6K
WK05dK52DMKeXFxzuxVhSRcCZb2+bHZn3qFOmon6kHbMqgzRZCKMcdydtoIvcFq7
cA5eTt6V6je3XVhc4lsSfP9cHraLDZZIjkaJ856fBpgJ30ypsHcpVY6UKTbFSHo=
=u1Vg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-21 23:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-21 19:52 [PATCH] ipc,sem block sem_lock on sma->lock during sma initialization Rik van Riel
2014-11-21 20:07 ` Rafael Aquini
2014-11-21 20:09 ` Andrew Morton
2014-11-21 20:29 ` Rik van Riel
2014-11-21 20:42 ` Andrew Morton
2014-11-21 23:03 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2014-11-22 0:56 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-11-22 3:40 ` Rik van Riel
2014-11-22 13:56 ` Manfred Spraul
2014-11-22 15:53 ` Rik van Riel
2014-11-22 19:14 ` Manfred Spraul
2014-11-22 20:14 ` Rik van Riel
2014-11-23 18:23 ` Manfred Spraul
2014-11-23 21:03 ` Rik van Riel
2014-11-23 21:36 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-11-24 10:41 ` Rafael Aquini
2014-11-24 20:49 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=546FC4D9.6010600@redhat.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aquini@redhat.com \
--cc=davidlohr@hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.