From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] Qualcomm RPM sleep states Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 16:03:39 -0800 Message-ID: <546FD2DB.1020809@codeaurora.org> References: <546FC674.1070005@codeaurora.org> <20141121232738.GP3815@sirena.org.uk> <546FCE3A.1000005@codeaurora.org> <20141121235436.GQ3815@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.11.231]:53791 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752467AbaKVADl (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Nov 2014 19:03:41 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20141121235436.GQ3815@sirena.org.uk> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Brown Cc: Bjorn Andersson , David Collins , Lina Iyer , Lee Jones , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On 11/21/2014 03:54 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 03:43:54PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >> This sleep set/active set stuff has to do with more than just >> regulators. It applies to any resource that the RPM provides, but >> regulators are a primary use case so you're on Cc and it would be great >> if you fully understood the regulator aspect here. > Step back: what is the RPM? Some kind of power management coprocessor > from the sounds of it? Yes. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 16:03:39 -0800 Subject: [RFC 0/2] Qualcomm RPM sleep states In-Reply-To: <20141121235436.GQ3815@sirena.org.uk> References: <546FC674.1070005@codeaurora.org> <20141121232738.GP3815@sirena.org.uk> <546FCE3A.1000005@codeaurora.org> <20141121235436.GQ3815@sirena.org.uk> Message-ID: <546FD2DB.1020809@codeaurora.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 11/21/2014 03:54 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 03:43:54PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >> This sleep set/active set stuff has to do with more than just >> regulators. It applies to any resource that the RPM provides, but >> regulators are a primary use case so you're on Cc and it would be great >> if you fully understood the regulator aspect here. > Step back: what is the RPM? Some kind of power management coprocessor > from the sounds of it? Yes. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project