From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: gf-complete v2 Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 14:38:04 +0100 Message-ID: <547334BC.4000505@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1nPGMhfVQTL2L1ttnpdOXf3TSkb3EOv1d" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:42455 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752603AbaKXNiH (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Nov 2014 08:38:07 -0500 Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Kevin Greenan Cc: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --1nPGMhfVQTL2L1ttnpdOXf3TSkb3EOv1d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Kevin, Now that we have NEON optimizations merged in master ( https://github.com= /ceph/gf-complete/commit/70dd94ae38f2d20dd78532a6dfd1310fdfb4a884 ), it w= ould be convenient (at least for Ceph integration) to have a v2 release. = What do you think ? --=20 Lo=EFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --1nPGMhfVQTL2L1ttnpdOXf3TSkb3EOv1d Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlRzNLwACgkQ8dLMyEl6F23C5gCffBZQChKackODQ3kKxcsV0x5y 7EIAoKkH4GSO1LA/k8n/uPklabh8zkQI =ebhy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1nPGMhfVQTL2L1ttnpdOXf3TSkb3EOv1d--