From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?B?VG9yYWxmIEbDtnJzdGVy?= Subject: thermal sensor numbering change intended ? Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 17:37:16 +0100 Message-ID: <54735EBC.4060409@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:63991 "EHLO mout.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751005AbaKXQhV (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Nov 2014 11:37:21 -0500 Received: from [192.168.178.21] ([85.177.144.159]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LsTge-1Y42QY1AW8-0121yg for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 17:37:18 +0100 Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org >> Linux PM list" At a dedicated server (i3770) I'm realized today that the sensors # hav= e been switched between 3.17.3 and .4. With 4 I do have : # tail -v /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone?/temp =3D=3D> /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone0/temp <=3D=3D 64000 =3D=3D> /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone1/temp <=3D=3D 27800 =3D=3D> /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone2/temp <=3D=3D 29800 whereas with with 3.17.3 the highest temperature (about 60=C2=B0) was s= hown at sensor 2. Intended or a regression ? --=20 Toralf pgp key: 0076 E94E