From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: gf-complete v2 Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 21:50:53 +0100 Message-ID: <54739A2D.5050401@dachary.org> References: <547334BC.4000505@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kvs9XIg8P3B9L2wchItU7HGME4whskO7E" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:42717 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750785AbaKXUuz (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Nov 2014 15:50:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Kevin Greenan Cc: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --kvs9XIg8P3B9L2wchItU7HGME4whskO7E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cool :-) Let me know when you have created the v2 branch and I'll update = the Ceph gitmodules accordingly. On 24/11/2014 20:32, Kevin Greenan wrote: > Hey Loic, >=20 > Sounds good to me! >=20 > -kevin >=20 > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 5:38 AM, Loic Dachary > wrote: >=20 > Hi Kevin, >=20 > Now that we have NEON optimizations merged in master ( https://gith= ub.com/ceph/gf-complete/commit/70dd94ae38f2d20dd78532a6dfd1310fdfb4a884 )= , it would be convenient (at least for Ceph integration) to have a v2 rel= ease. >=20 > What do you think ? > -- > Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >=20 >=20 --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --kvs9XIg8P3B9L2wchItU7HGME4whskO7E Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlRzmi0ACgkQ8dLMyEl6F234MQCgnCLC+DF8LqJ0z0jOWdftndql xYEAnA+bDrTlDRKYIz1xssaQuH0dQyQZ =S4lG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --kvs9XIg8P3B9L2wchItU7HGME4whskO7E--