From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomi Valkeinen Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 12:34:19 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] dt-bindings: simplefb: Drop the advice about using a specific path for nodes Message-Id: <5474774B.7080408@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="27PVP15wm3OlnjjolfnQfkRqWpFf2irNd" List-Id: References: <1416309051-26784-1-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1416309051-26784-1-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org --27PVP15wm3OlnjjolfnQfkRqWpFf2irNd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On 18/11/14 13:10, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi Tomi, >=20 > So it turns out we needed a v3, as I mistakenly went with "sunxi," as v= endor > prefix for the allwinner specific properties, but the registered vendor= prefix > for allwinner is "allwinnner,", this version fixes this. >=20 > Changes in v3: Use proper "allwinnner," for the compatible string and v= endor > specific properties. >=20 > Changes in v2: Changed the simplefb-sunxi bindings to use a single > sunxi,pipeline string property instead of a sunxi,pipeline int and a > sunxi,output string property. >=20 > This patch set is all acked up, and a fix to the binding changes you've= > already queued for 3.19, so please queue these 2 patches for 3.19. The discussions about this have continued in the earlier version of this series. Is this series still ok for everyone? The series looks fine to me, and has Grant's acks, so I'll merge it tomorrow to fbdev tree if no one objects (and my comment for the patch 2 about sunxi/allwinner was just my ignorance). Tomi --27PVP15wm3OlnjjolfnQfkRqWpFf2irNd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUdHdLAAoJEPo9qoy8lh715YAP+wT3w8lODi+f760uAuzrQPKJ 6oMTPzYwpZufXZZi9yD9jvXzVf1wn6m6v9UbbTP/9XLE8MlbaEj+aXoto8vUHPI9 316n5MSp6Z3JbgkYeaenECZSjcpp1WbafE37UQtS1fArDlaCRVMjVDhPALKvaEaj W6VMVnm3oxZ7C8/oB2+nEVIu8Q2laU+8AXGt4VOH2Gp+UFo2uLJqGAxdoo5w01W8 obYolfKruwcTFVPf/aJsWZcefuphD84DUMb+pdddXqLlSr0aqAdMfWHA5mmPCsI2 ePlAfKhgs3abkah+H5Z/HTTTJinNihjV4nanhbUCLWbHkGiLsJJVaEuTER3vxSg0 Q5fGqr75zBdDYTdDbgchH5AhbA7qYZDYK0JYvNkYb6/xcBu8tzfdlkgrnDIT9yTm MrxzYcK49vBByhlvbVARIPnzrF83EzQD9KOpkKKByWAwEP4QKL2+O5TvcY8B6rAm gstNar9WL5/nS3BxXYnj2MuR1SktVr0YykLLlpmh1YpkI7fcyR6vPtHQW+Qoj5/z GJIYcSITzv2L44pqPwiF3gtqFqf55xzaRt2Buljk5mTXI11KAkyh+9clNcFrPXW7 6uS8iAlQngJZ0dJZmgMUOWS+2ZPQr9Y0TNWQ0kmvJTqylmFscjftJ7PffrnKvBzP MA2CSjIkxNs2EzsQ1nvN =TUCo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --27PVP15wm3OlnjjolfnQfkRqWpFf2irNd-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tomi.valkeinen@ti.com (Tomi Valkeinen) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 14:34:19 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v3 0/2] dt-bindings: simplefb: Drop the advice about using a specific path for nodes In-Reply-To: <1416309051-26784-1-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> References: <1416309051-26784-1-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> Message-ID: <5474774B.7080408@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On 18/11/14 13:10, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi Tomi, > > So it turns out we needed a v3, as I mistakenly went with "sunxi," as vendor > prefix for the allwinner specific properties, but the registered vendor prefix > for allwinner is "allwinnner,", this version fixes this. > > Changes in v3: Use proper "allwinnner," for the compatible string and vendor > specific properties. > > Changes in v2: Changed the simplefb-sunxi bindings to use a single > sunxi,pipeline string property instead of a sunxi,pipeline int and a > sunxi,output string property. > > This patch set is all acked up, and a fix to the binding changes you've > already queued for 3.19, so please queue these 2 patches for 3.19. The discussions about this have continued in the earlier version of this series. Is this series still ok for everyone? The series looks fine to me, and has Grant's acks, so I'll merge it tomorrow to fbdev tree if no one objects (and my comment for the patch 2 about sunxi/allwinner was just my ignorance). Tomi -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomi Valkeinen Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] dt-bindings: simplefb: Drop the advice about using a specific path for nodes Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 14:34:19 +0200 Message-ID: <5474774B.7080408@ti.com> References: <1416309051-26784-1-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> Reply-To: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="27PVP15wm3OlnjjolfnQfkRqWpFf2irNd" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1416309051-26784-1-git-send-email-hdegoede-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , To: Hans de Goede , Grant Likely Cc: Ian Campbell , Rob Herring , Maxime Ripard , David Herrmann , Geert Uytterhoeven , linux-fbdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, devicetree , linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org --27PVP15wm3OlnjjolfnQfkRqWpFf2irNd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi, On 18/11/14 13:10, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi Tomi, > > So it turns out we needed a v3, as I mistakenly went with "sunxi," as vendor > prefix for the allwinner specific properties, but the registered vendor prefix > for allwinner is "allwinnner,", this version fixes this. > > Changes in v3: Use proper "allwinnner," for the compatible string and vendor > specific properties. > > Changes in v2: Changed the simplefb-sunxi bindings to use a single > sunxi,pipeline string property instead of a sunxi,pipeline int and a > sunxi,output string property. > > This patch set is all acked up, and a fix to the binding changes you've > already queued for 3.19, so please queue these 2 patches for 3.19. The discussions about this have continued in the earlier version of this series. Is this series still ok for everyone? The series looks fine to me, and has Grant's acks, so I'll merge it tomorrow to fbdev tree if no one objects (and my comment for the patch 2 about sunxi/allwinner was just my ignorance). Tomi --27PVP15wm3OlnjjolfnQfkRqWpFf2irNd--