From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lars-Peter Clausen Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ASoC: Remove 'const' from the device_node pointers Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 14:36:15 +0100 Message-ID: <547485CF.4050600@metafoo.de> References: <20141125131351.GC7712@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20141125131351.GC7712@sirena.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Brown , Jean-Francois Moine Cc: Liam Girdwood , Russell King , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On 11/25/2014 02:13 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:14:48PM +0100, Jean-Francois Moine wrote: >> As Russell King's explained it, there should not be pointers to >> struct device_node: >> >> "struct device_node is a ref-counted structure. That means if you >> store a reference to it, you should "get" it, and you should "put" >> it once you've done. The act of "put"ing the pointed-to structure >> involves writing to that structure, so it is totally unappropriate >> to store a device_node structure as a const pointer. It forces you >> to have to cast it back to a non-const pointer at various points >> in time to use various OF function calls." > > So, we're not holding references here (we're just doing comparisons, the > references need to be owned before we get into the core) The core itself will only do the comparisons and it is the board drivers responsibility to get and put the references. Making the pointers non const allows the board driver to use them to put the reference once the card has been unregistered rather than having to keep a separate set of pointers around. This should probably be mentioned in the commit message though. > I'm not seeing anything here removing casts? This patch used to be part of a two part series where the second patch removed the casts. This patch as already been applied though.