From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com ([209.85.212.180]:43173 "EHLO mail-wi0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751556AbaKYRGz (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Nov 2014 12:06:55 -0500 Received: by mail-wi0-f180.google.com with SMTP id n3so2172255wiv.1 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 09:06:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5474B728.8020800@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 18:06:48 +0100 From: Goffredo Baroncelli Reply-To: kreijack@inwind.it MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dsterba@suse.cz, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] New 'btrfs chunk list' command References: <1416931045-24259-1-git-send-email-kreijack@inwind.it> <20141125161343.GI26471@twin.jikos.cz> In-Reply-To: <20141125161343.GI26471@twin.jikos.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 11/25/2014 05:13 PM, David Sterba wrote: > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 04:57:21PM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote: >> This is a revamp of a my previous patches set[1]. After more than >> year of attempts these patches were never merged, so I tried to >> simplify them and to change a bit the focus. The previous patches set >> had the focus to the disk usage. > > The patches have been pending for last releases but I did not manage to > fix all accounting problems in time and did not want to delay the > releaes due to other important fixes. The 'new df' patchset is being > refreshed each time and is part of the integration branches which might > signify that they haven't been lost. > Thanks David for care of that. Unfortunately I didn't heard anything so I feared that this patch was lost. I hoped that simplifying the patches set, it would be more simple to integrate. BR G.Baroncelli -- gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D 17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5