From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fabio M. Di Nitto Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 06:51:50 +0100 Subject: [Cluster-devel] [ha-wg] [Linux-HA] [RFC] Organizing HA Summit 2015 In-Reply-To: <20141125095401.GG2522@suse.de> References: <540D853F.3090109@redhat.com> <20141124143957.GU2508@suse.de> <547346A9.6010901@redhat.com> <20141124151235.GX2508@suse.de> <54734BB5.3010104@redhat.com> <20141125095401.GG2522@suse.de> Message-ID: <54756A76.60905@fabbione.net> List-Id: To: cluster-devel.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/25/2014 10:54 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > On 2014-11-24T16:16:05, "Fabio M. Di Nitto" wrote: > >>> Yeah, well, devconf.cz is not such an interesting event for those who do >>> not wear the fedora ;-) >> That would be the perfect opportunity for you to convert users to Suse ;) > >>>> I?d prefer, at least for this round, to keep dates/location and explore >>>> the option to allow people to join remotely. Afterall there are tons of >>>> tools between google hangouts and others that would allow that. >>> That is, in my experience, the absolute worst. It creates second class >>> participants and is a PITA for everyone. >> I agree, it is still a way for people to join in tho. > > I personally disagree. In my experience, one either does a face-to-face > meeting, or a virtual one that puts everyone on the same footing. > Mixing both works really badly unless the team already knows each > other. > >>> I know that an in-person meeting is useful, but we have a large team in >>> Beijing, the US, Tasmania (OK, one crazy guy), various countries in >>> Europe etc. >> Yes same here. No difference.. we have one crazy guy in Australia.. > > Yeah, but you're already bringing him for your personal conference. > That's a bit different. ;-) > > OK, let's switch tracks a bit. What *topics* do we actually have? Can we > fill two days? Where would we want to collect them? I?d say either a google doc or any random etherpad/wiki instance will do just fine. As for the topics: - corosync qdevice and plugins (network, disk, integration with sdb?, others?) - corosync RRP / libknet integration/replacement - fence autodetection/autoconfiguration For the user facing topics (that is if there are enough participants and I only got 1 user confirmation so far): - demos, cluster 101, tutorials - get feedback - get feedback - get more feedback Fabio