From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Vladislav Bogdanov <bubble@hoster-ok.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 18:53:50 +0300
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [Pacemaker] [Linux-HA] [ha-wg] [RFC] Organizing
	HA Summit 2015
In-Reply-To: <20141125095401.GG2522@suse.de>
References: <540D853F.3090109@redhat.com>
	<20141124143957.GU2508@suse.de>	<547346A9.6010901@redhat.com>
	<20141124151235.GX2508@suse.de>	<54734BB5.3010104@redhat.com>
	<20141125095401.GG2522@suse.de>
Message-ID: <5475F78E.1040700@hoster-ok.com>
List-Id: <cluster-devel.redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

25.11.2014 12:54, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:...
>
> OK, let's switch tracks a bit. What *topics* do we actually have? Can we
> fill two days? Where would we want to collect them?
>

Just my 2c.

- It would be interesting to get some bird-view information
on what C APIs corosync and pacemaker currently provide to application
developers (one immediate use-case is in-app monitoring of the cluster
events).

- One more (more developer-bounded) topic could be a "resource degraded
state" support. From the user perspective it would be nice to have. One
immediate example is iscsi connection to several portals. When some
portals are not accessible, connection still may work, but in the
"degraded" state.

Best,
Vladislav