From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id F22E8E00970; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 05:13:19 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (ppf83764[at]freenet.de) * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [195.4.92.93 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Greylist: delayed 122 seconds by postgrey-1.32 at yocto-www; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 05:13:14 PST Received: from mout3.freenet.de (mout3.freenet.de [195.4.92.93]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B77AE008EC for ; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 05:13:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from [195.4.92.142] (helo=mjail2.freenet.de) by mout3.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID ppf83764@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.82 #2) id 1Xtyqk-0003ex-0a for meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 14:11:10 +0100 Received: from localhost ([::1]:60223 helo=mjail2.freenet.de) by mjail2.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID ppf83764@freenet.de) (Exim 4.82 #2) id 1Xtyqj-0008Gs-Sd for meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 14:11:09 +0100 Received: from mx11.freenet.de ([195.4.92.21]:40947) by mjail2.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID ppf83764@freenet.de) (Exim 4.82 #2) id 1XtyoH-0006ll-Ip for meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 14:08:37 +0100 Received: from p57b3ca3c.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([87.179.202.60]:52741 helo=[192.168.178.21]) by mx11.freenet.de with esmtpsa (ID ppf83764@freenet.de) (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (port 587) (Exim 4.82 #2) id 1XtyoH-0007oG-DS for meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 14:08:37 +0100 Message-ID: <54772254.1090501@freenet.de> Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 14:08:36 +0100 From: Peter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Originated-At: 87.179.202.60!52741 Subject: directFB and GTK + libvivante-dfb-mx6 build error X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 13:13:20 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, I'm supposed to run a WebkitGTK+ application with directFB output on an imx6 system. I read a lot of stuff and tried some things, but I still don't know whether it is possible or not... When I bitbake directfb-examples into a console-image with openembedded (daisy), some are working fine, while others crash with a segfault. When I include "packagegroup-core-directfb" in my image, libvivante-dfb-mx6 throws an error: Collected errors: * satisfy_dependencies_for: Cannot satisfy the following dependencies for packagegroup-core-directfb: * libvivante-dfb-mx6 * * opkg_install_cmd: Cannot install package packagegroup-core-directfb. Earlier this year Otavio and Lauren stated that DFB wouldn't work with any newer version of DFB than 1.6.3, so my 1.6.3 should be ok for the moment, but maybe my recipes are simply too old. [1] Should I try to update to newer vivante binaries? I think 3.10.17-1.0.0 are used in my current setup. However I read here [2] that gtk support for directFB was dropped anyway, but I can't find a proper source to prove it. Could anybody please enlighten me with the current state of development and what's the matter with libvivante-dfb-mx6? Thanks in advance, Peter Fink [1]: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-freescale/2014-March/007722.html [2]: https://www.yoctoproject.org/irc/%23yocto.2014-09-25.log.html#t2014-09-25T17:45:48