From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 33487E008E5; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 07:22:08 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [195.4.92.93 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (ppf83764[at]freenet.de) * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from mout3.freenet.de (mout3.freenet.de [195.4.92.93]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA0ACE00874 for ; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 07:21:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from [195.4.92.141] (helo=mjail1.freenet.de) by mout3.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID ppf83764@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.82 #2) id 1Xu0tJ-0008Q3-Ty for meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 16:21:57 +0100 Received: from localhost ([::1]:59075 helo=mjail1.freenet.de) by mjail1.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID ppf83764@freenet.de) (Exim 4.82 #2) id 1Xu0tJ-0007Ea-PZ for meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 16:21:57 +0100 Received: from mx16.freenet.de ([195.4.92.26]:59175) by mjail1.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID ppf83764@freenet.de) (Exim 4.82 #2) id 1Xu0qw-00060Z-Ss; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 16:19:30 +0100 Received: from p57b3ca3c.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([87.179.202.60]:52979 helo=[192.168.178.21]) by mx16.freenet.de with esmtpsa (ID ppf83764@freenet.de) (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (port 587) (Exim 4.82 #2) id 1Xu0qw-0003Ne-MD; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 16:19:30 +0100 Message-ID: <54774101.60606@freenet.de> Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 16:19:29 +0100 From: Peter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daiane Angolini References: <54772254.1090501@freenet.de> In-Reply-To: X-Originated-At: 87.179.202.60!52979 Cc: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: directFB and GTK + libvivante-dfb-mx6 build error X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 15:22:08 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Am 27.11.2014 um 15:42 schrieb Daiane Angolini: > On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Peter wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm supposed to run a WebkitGTK+ application with directFB output on an imx6 >> system. >> >> I read a lot of stuff and tried some things, but I still don't know whether >> it is possible or not... >> >> When I bitbake directfb-examples into a console-image with openembedded >> (daisy), some are working fine, while others crash with a segfault. >> >> When I include "packagegroup-core-directfb" in my image, libvivante-dfb-mx6 >> throws an error: >> >> Collected errors: >> * satisfy_dependencies_for: Cannot satisfy the following dependencies for >> packagegroup-core-directfb: >> * libvivante-dfb-mx6 * >> * opkg_install_cmd: Cannot install package packagegroup-core-directfb. > > Only to be sure. > Have you changed your DISTRO_FEATURES? Yes I added: DISTRO_FEATURES_remove = "x11 wayland" DISTRO_FEATURES += "directfb" > Have you tried core-image-directfb? No, because it was missing for some reason. But after re-adding it, it gives the same error. Peter > Daiane >> >> >> Earlier this year Otavio and Lauren stated that DFB wouldn't work with any >> newer version of DFB than 1.6.3, so my 1.6.3 should be ok for the moment, >> but maybe my recipes are simply too old. [1] >> Should I try to update to newer vivante binaries? I think 3.10.17-1.0.0 are >> used in my current setup. >> >> However I read here [2] that gtk support for directFB was dropped anyway, >> but I can't find a proper source to prove it. >> >> Could anybody please enlighten me with the current state of development and >> what's the matter with libvivante-dfb-mx6? >> >> Thanks in advance, >> Peter Fink >> >> [1]: >> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-freescale/2014-March/007722.html >> [2]: >> https://www.yoctoproject.org/irc/%23yocto.2014-09-25.log.html#t2014-09-25T17:45:48 >> --