From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from a.ns.miles-group.at ([95.130.255.143] helo=radon.swed.at) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Xu22z-00030u-5Q for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 16:36:01 +0000 Message-ID: <547752D1.6040000@nod.at> Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:35:29 +0100 From: Richard Weinberger MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dedekind1@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] UBI: Fastmap: Ensure that all fastmap work is done upon WL shutdown References: <1416835236-25185-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> <1416835236-25185-4-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> <1417102739.5858.112.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <54774C71.50807@nod.at> <1417105793.5858.117.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1417105793.5858.117.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Am 27.11.2014 um 17:29 schrieb Artem Bityutskiy: > On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 17:08 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: >>> Obviously, there is some misunderstanding. This looks like lack of >>> separation and misuse of layering. I am missing explanations why I am >>> wrong... >> >> So you want me to use the UBI WL background thread for the scheduled fastmap work? > > No. It is more like either use it or do not use it. Sorry, I don't understand. What do you want to do to? >> I didn't do it that way because you said more than once that fastmap is fastmap and >> WL is WL. Therefore I've separated it. > > And "separated" meaning adding this code to wl.c? > > +#ifdef CONFIG_MTD_UBI_FASTMAP > + flush_work(&ubi->fm_work); > +#endif > > Could it be separated some more then? > Of course, commit "UBI: Move fastmap specific functions out of wl.c" does. But this commit is *bugfix* commit. Thanks, //richard