From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Wright Subject: Re: ipset website Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 20:08:26 -0800 Message-ID: <547946BA.106@nospam.hostisimo.com> References: <547919CB.7030202@nospam.hostisimo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from theorb.net ([204.11.228.190]:39616 "HELO b.mx.theorb.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750996AbaK2EIY (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Nov 2014 23:08:24 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 11/28/2014 05:23 PM, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > On Saturday 2014-11-29 01:56, Mike Wright wrote: >> >> I've made some updates to the ipset.netfilter.org website. The changes are >> cosmetic, such as highlighting the menu link when on a specific page, > > The syntax for color= is probably incorrect, it is missing #. > But why do you even introduce the archaic tag? The CSS > class "hot" seemed to be just right. > The tags were in the original. That was the first thing I removed. > Forcing a scrollbar also seems backwards. If the table is to > have a consistent size irrespective of scrollbar, one would > probably use CSS's position: or float:. > Those solutions won't work. The scroll bar is added to the page by the browser, outside of the body, which causes the body width to narrow, specifically by different widths depending on which browser. The only way to accomplish that is with javascript. I feel that is an inappropriate addition to the pages. I prefer that each page's body width be constant. Six of the nine pages would have one anyway. >> framing the man pages so that you don't have to use the "back" button to >> continue navigating the site (required adding four new pages). > > It adds another scrollbar rather than just filling the page downards. > This would preferably call for something like SSI, or PHP's include(), > for avoiding the duplication of the menu. > Agreed. The