Re: [PATCH/RFC v8 11/14] DT: Add documentation for the mfd Maxim max77693

[Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@samsung.com>]

Hi Pavel,

On 12/01/2014 02:02 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>>> Is this one needed? Just ommit child note if it is not there.
>>
>> It is needed because you can have one led connected two both
>> outputs. This allows to describe such a design.
>
> Ok.
>
>>>> +- maxim,trigger-type : Array of trigger types in order: flash, torch
>>>> +	Possible trigger types:
>>>> +		0 - Rising edge of the signal triggers the flash/torch,
>>>> +		1 - Signal level controls duration of the flash/torch.
>>>> +- maxim,trigger : Array of flags indicating which trigger can activate given led
>>>> +	in order: fled1, fled2
>>>> +	Possible flag values (can be combined):
>>>> +		1 - FLASH pin of the chip,
>>>> +		2 - TORCH pin of the chip,
>>>> +		4 - software via I2C command.
>>>
>>> Is it good idea to have bitfields like this?
>>>
>>> Make these required properties of the subnode?
>>
>> This is related to a single property: trigger. I think that splitting
>> it to three properties would make unnecessary noise in the
>> binding.
>
> Well, maybe it is not that much noise, and you'll have useful names
> (not a bitfield).

I think we'd need an opinion of at least one more person :)

> Should these properties move to the LED subnode?

I would leave them device specific.

Regards,
Jacek