All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: at91: allow disabled gpio controllers
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 14:59:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <547C7446.1090909@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1417193367-12422-1-git-send-email-ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>

Le 28/11/2014 17:49, Ludovic Desroches a ?crit :
> This patch allows to have gpio controller with status set to disabled.
> 
> gpio_banks represents all the gpio banks available on the device whereas
> nbanks represents the gpio banks used. Having a disabled gpio controller
> involves that nbanks value is lower than gpio_banks and that some
> pointers in the gpio_chips array are NULL. This patch deals with these
> specific cases.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>

Yes:

Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>

Linus, is it too late for 3.18? Otherwise, we can add this tag:

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.18+

Bye,

> ---
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Without this patch, pinctrl is broken on sama5d4 because pinctrl-at91 doesn't
> support unused gpio bank.
> 
> 
>  drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
> index 94643bb..95ae122 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
> @@ -981,7 +981,8 @@ static void at91_pinctrl_child_count(struct at91_pinctrl *info,
>  
>  	for_each_child_of_node(np, child) {
>  		if (of_device_is_compatible(child, gpio_compat)) {
> -			info->nbanks++;
> +			if (of_device_is_available(child))
> +				info->nbanks++;
>  		} else {
>  			info->nfunctions++;
>  			info->ngroups += of_get_child_count(child);
> @@ -1003,11 +1004,11 @@ static int at91_pinctrl_mux_mask(struct at91_pinctrl *info,
>  	}
>  
>  	size /= sizeof(*list);
> -	if (!size || size % info->nbanks) {
> +	if (!size || size % gpio_banks) {
>  		dev_err(info->dev, "wrong mux mask array should be by %d\n", info->nbanks);
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
> -	info->nmux = size / info->nbanks;
> +	info->nmux = size / gpio_banks;
>  
>  	info->mux_mask = devm_kzalloc(info->dev, sizeof(u32) * size, GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!info->mux_mask) {
> @@ -1185,7 +1186,7 @@ static int at91_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct at91_pinctrl *info;
>  	struct pinctrl_pin_desc *pdesc;
> -	int ret, i, j, k;
> +	int ret, i, j, k, ngpio_chips_enabled = 0;
>  
>  	info = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!info)
> @@ -1200,12 +1201,14 @@ static int at91_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	 * to obtain references to the struct gpio_chip * for them, and we
>  	 * need this to proceed.
>  	 */
> -	for (i = 0; i < info->nbanks; i++) {
> -		if (!gpio_chips[i]) {
> -			dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "GPIO chip %d not registered yet\n", i);
> -			devm_kfree(&pdev->dev, info);
> -			return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> -		}
> +	for (i = 0; i < gpio_banks; i++) {
> +		if (gpio_chips[i])
> +			ngpio_chips_enabled++;
> +	}
> +	if (ngpio_chips_enabled < info->nbanks) {
> +		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "All GPIO chips are not registered yet\n");
> +		devm_kfree(&pdev->dev, info);
> +		return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>  	}
>  
>  	at91_pinctrl_desc.name = dev_name(&pdev->dev);
> @@ -1234,8 +1237,9 @@ static int at91_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	}
>  
>  	/* We will handle a range of GPIO pins */
> -	for (i = 0; i < info->nbanks; i++)
> -		pinctrl_add_gpio_range(info->pctl, &gpio_chips[i]->range);
> +	for (i = 0; i < gpio_banks; i++)
> +		if (gpio_chips[i])
> +			pinctrl_add_gpio_range(info->pctl, &gpio_chips[i]->range);
>  
>  	dev_info(&pdev->dev, "initialized AT91 pinctrl driver\n");
>  
> @@ -1681,6 +1685,8 @@ static void at91_gpio_probe_fixup(void)
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < gpio_banks; i++) {
>  		at91_gpio = gpio_chips[i];
> +		if (!at91_gpio)
> +			continue;
>  
>  		/*
>  		 * GPIO controller are grouped on some SoC:
> 


-- 
Nicolas Ferre

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Ludovic Desroches
	<ludovic.desroches-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org
Cc: plagnioj-sclMFOaUSTBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org,
	Alexandre Belloni
	<alexandre.belloni-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
	Boris BREZILLON
	<boris.brezillon-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: at91: allow disabled gpio controllers
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 14:59:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <547C7446.1090909@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1417193367-12422-1-git-send-email-ludovic.desroches-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

Le 28/11/2014 17:49, Ludovic Desroches a écrit :
> This patch allows to have gpio controller with status set to disabled.
> 
> gpio_banks represents all the gpio banks available on the device whereas
> nbanks represents the gpio banks used. Having a disabled gpio controller
> involves that nbanks value is lower than gpio_banks and that some
> pointers in the gpio_chips array are NULL. This patch deals with these
> specific cases.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

Yes:

Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

Linus, is it too late for 3.18? Otherwise, we can add this tag:

Cc: <stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org> # v3.18+

Bye,

> ---
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Without this patch, pinctrl is broken on sama5d4 because pinctrl-at91 doesn't
> support unused gpio bank.
> 
> 
>  drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
> index 94643bb..95ae122 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
> @@ -981,7 +981,8 @@ static void at91_pinctrl_child_count(struct at91_pinctrl *info,
>  
>  	for_each_child_of_node(np, child) {
>  		if (of_device_is_compatible(child, gpio_compat)) {
> -			info->nbanks++;
> +			if (of_device_is_available(child))
> +				info->nbanks++;
>  		} else {
>  			info->nfunctions++;
>  			info->ngroups += of_get_child_count(child);
> @@ -1003,11 +1004,11 @@ static int at91_pinctrl_mux_mask(struct at91_pinctrl *info,
>  	}
>  
>  	size /= sizeof(*list);
> -	if (!size || size % info->nbanks) {
> +	if (!size || size % gpio_banks) {
>  		dev_err(info->dev, "wrong mux mask array should be by %d\n", info->nbanks);
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
> -	info->nmux = size / info->nbanks;
> +	info->nmux = size / gpio_banks;
>  
>  	info->mux_mask = devm_kzalloc(info->dev, sizeof(u32) * size, GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!info->mux_mask) {
> @@ -1185,7 +1186,7 @@ static int at91_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct at91_pinctrl *info;
>  	struct pinctrl_pin_desc *pdesc;
> -	int ret, i, j, k;
> +	int ret, i, j, k, ngpio_chips_enabled = 0;
>  
>  	info = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!info)
> @@ -1200,12 +1201,14 @@ static int at91_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	 * to obtain references to the struct gpio_chip * for them, and we
>  	 * need this to proceed.
>  	 */
> -	for (i = 0; i < info->nbanks; i++) {
> -		if (!gpio_chips[i]) {
> -			dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "GPIO chip %d not registered yet\n", i);
> -			devm_kfree(&pdev->dev, info);
> -			return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> -		}
> +	for (i = 0; i < gpio_banks; i++) {
> +		if (gpio_chips[i])
> +			ngpio_chips_enabled++;
> +	}
> +	if (ngpio_chips_enabled < info->nbanks) {
> +		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "All GPIO chips are not registered yet\n");
> +		devm_kfree(&pdev->dev, info);
> +		return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>  	}
>  
>  	at91_pinctrl_desc.name = dev_name(&pdev->dev);
> @@ -1234,8 +1237,9 @@ static int at91_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	}
>  
>  	/* We will handle a range of GPIO pins */
> -	for (i = 0; i < info->nbanks; i++)
> -		pinctrl_add_gpio_range(info->pctl, &gpio_chips[i]->range);
> +	for (i = 0; i < gpio_banks; i++)
> +		if (gpio_chips[i])
> +			pinctrl_add_gpio_range(info->pctl, &gpio_chips[i]->range);
>  
>  	dev_info(&pdev->dev, "initialized AT91 pinctrl driver\n");
>  
> @@ -1681,6 +1685,8 @@ static void at91_gpio_probe_fixup(void)
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < gpio_banks; i++) {
>  		at91_gpio = gpio_chips[i];
> +		if (!at91_gpio)
> +			continue;
>  
>  		/*
>  		 * GPIO controller are grouped on some SoC:
> 


-- 
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-12-01 13:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-28 16:49 [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: at91: allow disabled gpio controllers Ludovic Desroches
2014-11-28 16:49 ` Ludovic Desroches
2014-11-28 16:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: at91/dt: sama5d4: add pioD controller Ludovic Desroches
2014-11-28 16:49   ` Ludovic Desroches
2014-12-01 13:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: at91: allow disabled gpio controllers Linus Walleij
2014-12-01 13:56   ` Linus Walleij
2014-12-01 14:39   ` Ludovic Desroches
2014-12-01 14:39     ` Ludovic Desroches
2014-12-03 15:08   ` Ludovic Desroches
2014-12-03 15:08     ` Ludovic Desroches
2014-12-05 10:17     ` Linus Walleij
2014-12-05 10:17       ` Linus Walleij
2014-12-15  9:57       ` [PATCH RFC] pinctrl: at91 Ludovic Desroches
2014-12-15  9:57         ` Ludovic Desroches
2014-12-19 14:41         ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-12-19 14:41           ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-01-06  9:37           ` Ludovic Desroches
2015-01-06  9:37             ` Ludovic Desroches
2015-01-14 12:26             ` Linus Walleij
2015-01-14 12:26               ` Linus Walleij
2015-01-14 15:03               ` Ludovic Desroches
2015-01-14 15:03                 ` Ludovic Desroches
2015-01-19 10:12                 ` Linus Walleij
2015-01-19 10:12                   ` Linus Walleij
2015-01-19 10:30                   ` Ludovic Desroches
2015-01-19 10:30                     ` Ludovic Desroches
2015-01-19 10:54                     ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-01-19 10:54                       ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-12-01 13:59 ` Nicolas Ferre [this message]
2014-12-01 13:59   ` [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: at91: allow disabled gpio controllers Nicolas Ferre
2014-12-02 14:50   ` Linus Walleij
2014-12-02 14:50     ` Linus Walleij
2015-01-14 20:45 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2015-01-14 20:45   ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2015-01-19 10:16   ` Linus Walleij
2015-01-19 10:16     ` Linus Walleij
2015-01-19 10:34     ` Ludovic Desroches
2015-01-19 10:34       ` Ludovic Desroches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=547C7446.1090909@atmel.com \
    --to=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.