From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Vrabel Subject: Re: Buggy interaction of live migration and p2m updates Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 14:38:23 +0000 Message-ID: <547C7D5F.3090009@citrix.com> References: <546E32BB.8090909@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <546E32BB.8090909@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Andrew Cooper , Xen-devel List Cc: Juergen Gross , Wei Liu , Ian Campbell , Tim Deegan , Ian Jackson , David Vrabel , Jan Beulich , Shriram Rajagopalan , Hongyang Yang List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 20/11/14 18:28, Andrew Cooper wrote: > > 1) Freeze the guests p2m during live migrate > 2) Deep p2m dirty tracking > 3) Eagerly check for p2m structure changes. > 4) Request p2m structure change updates from the guest > Proposed solution: A combination of 2, 3 and 4. Option 5: don't change anything. PV guests and toolstacks are well-behaved and ensure that p2m updates do not occur during domain save. We have never supported migrating non-cooperative PV guests. I'd be more interested fixing this for HVM guests. David