From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Juergen Gross Subject: Re: PVHVM drivers in upstream linux kernel Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 12:02:06 +0100 Message-ID: <547D9C2E.3040804@suse.com> References: <547D88EF.4050206@suse.com> <547D9A4A.6010201@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <547D9A4A.6010201@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: David Vrabel , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 12/02/2014 11:54 AM, David Vrabel wrote: > On 02/12/14 09:39, Juergen Gross wrote: >> Hi, >> >> looking into the upstream linux sources I realized that the PVHVM >> drivers of XEN are only available with the pvops kernel. Is this on >> purpose? Shouldn't the frontend drivers, xen/platform-pci.c etc. be >> configurable without having to enable CONFIG_PARAVIRT? > > I suppose that would be possible but I don't think it's a useful > configuration because you would lose PV spinlocks for example. Having no pv spinlocks on a single vcpu HVM guest isn't so bad. Having no pv-drivers for disks and networking is worse. Juergen