From: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kgene.kim@samsung.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, heiko@sntech.de,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
tomasz.figa@gmail.com, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
thomas.ab@samsung.com, Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] soc: samsung: add exynos chipid driver support
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 10:30:36 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <547FEA74.1010900@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19026872.NZqUJn3Abb@wuerfel>
Hi Arnd,
On Wednesday 03 December 2014 04:13 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> Exynos SoCs have Chipid, for identification of product IDs
>> and SoC revisions. This patch intendes to provide initialization
>> code for all these functionalites, at the same time it provides some
>> sysfs entries for accessing these information to userspace.
>>
>> This driver usese existing binding for exnos-chipid.
>
> Nice!
Thanks for review.
>
> On Wednesday 03 December 2014 13:47:37 Pankaj Dubey wrote:
>
>> + soc_dev_attr->soc_id = exynos_product_id_to_name(soc_product_id);
>> +
>> + soc_dev = soc_device_register(soc_dev_attr);
>> + if (IS_ERR(soc_dev))
>> + goto free_rev;
>> +
>> + device_create_file(soc_device_to_device(soc_dev), &exynos_product_attr);
>> + device_create_file(soc_device_to_device(soc_dev),
>> + &exynos_main_rev_attr);
>> + device_create_file(soc_device_to_device(soc_dev), &exynos_sub_rev_attr);
>> +
>
> I don't like the idea of having three extra nonstandard properties here,
> especially when you are not using the machine field for anything useful.
>
I did not get you here. Any suggestions how we can use 'machine' field
more useful way.
> Also, all three of these just come from the same register, why expose
> them all as the machine and revision standard properties.
>
Agreed. These properties are basically giving same information but with
small modification.
As you said these are getting exposed via standard properties as well,
so I have no issue to drop them. Just waiting for more review from
Samsung folks, will take care of this in next version.
Thanks,
Pankaj Dubey
> Arnd
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: pankaj.dubey@samsung.com (Pankaj Dubey)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/2] soc: samsung: add exynos chipid driver support
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 10:30:36 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <547FEA74.1010900@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19026872.NZqUJn3Abb@wuerfel>
Hi Arnd,
On Wednesday 03 December 2014 04:13 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> Exynos SoCs have Chipid, for identification of product IDs
>> and SoC revisions. This patch intendes to provide initialization
>> code for all these functionalites, at the same time it provides some
>> sysfs entries for accessing these information to userspace.
>>
>> This driver usese existing binding for exnos-chipid.
>
> Nice!
Thanks for review.
>
> On Wednesday 03 December 2014 13:47:37 Pankaj Dubey wrote:
>
>> + soc_dev_attr->soc_id = exynos_product_id_to_name(soc_product_id);
>> +
>> + soc_dev = soc_device_register(soc_dev_attr);
>> + if (IS_ERR(soc_dev))
>> + goto free_rev;
>> +
>> + device_create_file(soc_device_to_device(soc_dev), &exynos_product_attr);
>> + device_create_file(soc_device_to_device(soc_dev),
>> + &exynos_main_rev_attr);
>> + device_create_file(soc_device_to_device(soc_dev), &exynos_sub_rev_attr);
>> +
>
> I don't like the idea of having three extra nonstandard properties here,
> especially when you are not using the machine field for anything useful.
>
I did not get you here. Any suggestions how we can use 'machine' field
more useful way.
> Also, all three of these just come from the same register, why expose
> them all as the machine and revision standard properties.
>
Agreed. These properties are basically giving same information but with
small modification.
As you said these are getting exposed via standard properties as well,
so I have no issue to drop them. Just waiting for more review from
Samsung folks, will take care of this in next version.
Thanks,
Pankaj Dubey
> Arnd
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-04 5:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-03 8:17 [PATCH v4 0/2] Introducing Exynos ChipId driver Pankaj Dubey
2014-12-03 8:17 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-12-03 8:17 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] soc: samsung: add exynos chipid driver support Pankaj Dubey
2014-12-03 8:17 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-12-03 10:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-03 10:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-04 5:00 ` Pankaj Dubey [this message]
2014-12-04 5:00 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-12-04 9:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-04 9:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
[not found] ` <CAKew6eVTpu0qWQqd_sxqmRJF6qNMxJp5Mn0_ta5vO+pHAv66ug@mail.gmail.com>
2014-12-11 3:00 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-12-11 3:00 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-12-03 8:17 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] ARM: EXYNOS: refactoring of mach-exynos to enable chipid driver Pankaj Dubey
2014-12-03 8:17 ` Pankaj Dubey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=547FEA74.1010900@samsung.com \
--to=pankaj.dubey@samsung.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.ab@samsung.com \
--cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.