From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?B?Um9nZXIgUGF1IE1vbm7DqQ==?= Subject: Removing the PVH assert in arch/x86/hvm/io.c:87 Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 17:35:59 +0100 Message-ID: <54808D6F.302@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1XwZOA-0000W9-M1 for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 16:36:22 +0000 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Jan Beulich , Mukesh Rathor , Tim Deegan List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Hello, I've just stumbled upon this assert while testing PVH on different hardware. It was added in 7c4870 as a safe belt, but it turns out INS and OUTS go through handle_mmio. So using this instructions from a PVH guest basically kills Xen. I've removed it and everything seems fine, so I'm considering sending a patch for 4.5 in order to have it removed. I think the path that could trigger the crash because of the missing vioapic stuff is already guarded by the other chunk added in the same patch. Roger.