From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mabj@itu.dk (=?windows-1252?Q?Matias_Bj=F8rling?=)
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 14:21:01 +0100
Subject: NVM Express 1.2 - Controller Memory Buffer Functionality.
In-Reply-To: <36F6EBABA23FEF4391AF72944D2289016EC8CFE6@BBYEXM01.pmc-sierra.internal>
References: <36F6EBABA23FEF4391AF72944D2289016EC8C680@BBYEXM01.pmc-sierra.internal>,
 <alpine.LNX.2.00.1412042256430.4225@localhost.lm.intel.com>
 <75526C13-EF09-4050-855B-CA71DD60A290@pmcs.com>
 <alpine.LNX.2.00.1412050022300.4225@localhost.lm.intel.com>
 <36F6EBABA23FEF4391AF72944D2289016EC8CFE6@BBYEXM01.pmc-sierra.internal>
Message-ID: <5481B13D.6050805@itu.dk>

Hi Stephen,

The tree is here:

   http://git.infradead.org/users/kbusch/qemu-nvme.git

Cheers,
Matias

On 12/05/2014 10:02 AM, Stephen Bates wrote:
> Keith
>
> " I often implement h/w features on a virtual device if real h/w is not available. If you're interested, I'll add CMB to my QEMU tree sometime in the next week."
>
> That would be great. Can you send a link to that tree?
>
> Cheers
>
> Stephen
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keith Busch [mailto:keith.busch at intel.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 5, 2014 8:31 AM
> To: Stephen Bates
> Cc: Keith Busch; linux-nvme at lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: NVM Express 1.2 - Controller Memory Buffer Functionality.
>
> On Thu, 4 Dec 2014, Stephen Bates wrote:
>> Keith
>>
>> Ah, very much a case of "be careful what you ask for" ;-). OK I will start to look at this soon.  One issue I can forsee is lack of 1.2 compliant drives to do testing on. Does anyone have any ideas how best to handle that?
>
> I often implement h/w features on a virtual device if real h/w is not available. If you're interested, I'll add CMB to my QEMU tree sometime in the next week.
>
>> Cheers
>> Stephen
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-nvme mailing list
> Linux-nvme at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme
>