From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Grall Subject: Re: [PATCH] have architectures specify the number of PIRQs a hardware domain gets Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 16:05:47 +0000 Message-ID: <5481D7DB.3040907@linaro.org> References: <5481C67D020000780004D2D1@mail.emea.novell.com> <1417789634.22808.66.camel@eu.citrix.com> <5481C30B.3020901@linaro.org> <1417790527.22808.67.camel@eu.citrix.com> <5481CE85.8010502@linaro.org> <5481E05F020000780004D430@mail.emea.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1XwvOE-0004oK-1j for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 05 Dec 2014 16:05:54 +0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id y19so1275238wgg.35 for ; Fri, 05 Dec 2014 08:05:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5481E05F020000780004D430@mail.emea.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: Keir Fraser , Stefano Stabellini , Andrew Cooper , Ian Jackson , Tim Deegan , Ian Campbell , David Vrabel , xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 05/12/14 15:42, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 05.12.14 at 16:25, wrote: >> - XEN_DOMCTL_irq_permission => I don't really understand this bits. >> AFAIU the pirq number is different on each domain. But we use it to >> check permission on both domain. Shouldn't we translate the pirq to irq >> for the current->domain? > > Indeed, see also > http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-12/msg00219.html Do you plan to send a patch to resolve this problem? Regards, -- Julien Grall