From: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Cc: qingtao.cao@windriver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] rm_work.bbclass: inhibit rm_work per recipe
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 17:12:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5482882.4phbAeRO1n@helios> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ab888a7abe849f3170d5386b577f8a92e8ff5385.1363156578.git.Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
On Wednesday 13 March 2013 15:01:33 Qi.Chen@windriver.com wrote:
> From: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
>
> Use RM_WORK_WHITELIST to inhibit rm_work per recipe. In this way,
> one can use rm_work for the most of the recipes but still keep the
> work area for the recipe(s) one is working on.
>
> As an example, the following settings in local.conf will inhibit
> rm_work for icu-native, icu and busybox.
> INHERIT += "rm_work"
> RM_WORK_WHITELIST += "icu-native icu busybox"
>
> If we comment out the RM_WORK_WHITELIST line and do a rebuild, the
> working area of these recipes will be cleaned up.
This is a great feature, but I just looked at it and realised that the term
"whitelist" isn't really correct - this is more of a blacklist.
The question is does it matter? If so we should probably change it now before
it becomes too hard to change...
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-26 17:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-13 7:01 [PATCH 0/1] rm_work.bbclass: inhibit rm_work per recipe Qi.Chen
2013-03-13 7:01 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Qi.Chen
2013-03-26 17:12 ` Paul Eggleton [this message]
2013-03-26 17:15 ` Burton, Ross
2013-03-26 17:25 ` Phil Blundell
2013-03-26 17:52 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-04-09 21:01 ` Phil Blundell
2013-04-09 22:55 ` Martin Jansa
2013-03-26 17:55 ` Martin Jansa
2013-03-26 18:02 ` Paul Eggleton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5482882.4phbAeRO1n@helios \
--to=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=qingtao.cao@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.