From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from resqmta-ch2-08v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.40]:52230 "EHLO
	resqmta-ch2-08v.sys.comcast.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751461AbaLHHGS (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 8 Dec 2014 02:06:18 -0500
Message-ID: <54854DE5.70000@pobox.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 23:06:13 -0800
From: Robert White <rwhite@pobox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ashford@whisperpc.com
CC: Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de>,
        Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@gmail.com>,
        linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Why is the actual disk usage of btrfs considered unknowable?
References: <CAH-HCWU9GEjvZLH=rwYev_O0S4_Cs9FJvRiJgBiOK8gdxqK5CQ@mail.gmail.com>    <44320137.fRRuR6EFMP@merkaba> <1610909.CxuY1Bb9iL@merkaba>    <548537D1.7070602@pobox.com> <9e9315cd115a893c07723a2993ef660d.squirrel@webmail.wanet.net>
In-Reply-To: <9e9315cd115a893c07723a2993ef660d.squirrel@webmail.wanet.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>

On 12/07/2014 10:20 PM, ashford@whisperpc.com wrote:
> Martin,
>
> Excellent analysis.
>
>> On 12/07/2014 07:40 AM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
>>
>> So while the core problem isn't insoluble, in real life it is _not_
>> _worth_ _solving_.

Your email quoting things is messed up... I wrote that analysis... 8-)