On 2014-12-08 09:16, Shriramana Sharma wrote: > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Austin S Hemmelgarn > wrote: >> Personally, I prefer a somewhat hybrid approach where everyone has *sbin in >> their path, but file permissions are used to control what non-administrators >> can run. > > This is exactly the same approach as Ubuntu, since non-superuser can't > really do anything active (whether creating or deleting) with */sbin > commands, but only querying (like ifconfig, btrfs subvol list etc). So > this is not really hybrid of anything it seems. > IIRC, Ubuntu relies on the fact that normal users don't have the capabilities required for the privileged operations, as opposed to just not letting them run the binaries at all.