From: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: prevent unmapped hw queue from being scheduled
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 21:39:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54867CFA.8040304@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACVXFVMzQ8TkxsiUujUZR0E=0Lx=BtZ2BsLmhCTHk8D9dr8rag@mail.gmail.com>
On 12/08/2014 05:41 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 7:38 PM, Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> wrote:
>> When one hardware queue has no mapped software queues, it
>> shouldn't have been scheduled. Otherwise WARNING or OOPS
>> can triggered.
>>
>> blk_mq_hw_queue_mapped() helper is introduce for fixing
>> the problem.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
>> ---
>> block/blk-mq.c | 8 ++++++--
>> block/blk-mq.h | 5 +++++
>> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
>> index c95abc6..c916ad0 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
>> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
>> @@ -599,7 +599,7 @@ static void blk_mq_rq_timer(unsigned long priv)
>> * If not software queues are currently mapped to this
>> * hardware queue, there's nothing to check
>> */
>> - if (!hctx->nr_ctx || !hctx->tags)
>> + if (!blk_mq_hw_queue_mapped(hctx))
>> continue;
>>
>> blk_mq_tag_busy_iter(hctx, blk_mq_check_expired, &data);
>> @@ -819,7 +819,8 @@ static int blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
>>
>> void blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, bool async)
>> {
>> - if (unlikely(test_bit(BLK_MQ_S_STOPPED, &hctx->state)))
>> + if (unlikely(test_bit(BLK_MQ_S_STOPPED, &hctx->state) ||
>> + !blk_mq_hw_queue_mapped(hctx)))
>> return;
>>
>> if (!async) {
>> @@ -926,6 +927,9 @@ static void blk_mq_delay_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
>>
>> void blk_mq_delay_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, unsigned long msecs)
>> {
>> + if (unlikely(!blk_mq_hw_queue_mapped(hctx)))
>> + return;
>> +
>> kblockd_schedule_delayed_work_on(blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu(hctx),
>> &hctx->delay_work, msecs_to_jiffies(msecs));
>> }
>> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.h b/block/blk-mq.h
>> index d567d52..206230e 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-mq.h
>> +++ b/block/blk-mq.h
>> @@ -115,4 +115,9 @@ static inline void blk_mq_set_alloc_data(struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data,
>> data->hctx = hctx;
>> }
>>
>> +static inline bool blk_mq_hw_queue_mapped(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
>> +{
>> + return hctx->nr_ctx && hctx->tags;
>> +}
>> +
>> #endif
>
> Gentle ping...
Picked up for 3.19, sorry for the delay. I'm curious how this queue gets
scheduled, though. My worry here would be that we are masking a bug that
should be fixed separately.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-09 4:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-03 11:38 [PATCH] blk-mq: prevent unmapped hw queue from being scheduled Ming Lei
2014-12-09 0:41 ` Ming Lei
2014-12-09 4:39 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2014-12-09 4:56 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54867CFA.8040304@fb.com \
--to=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.