From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lars-Peter Clausen Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ALSA: sound/atmel/ac97c.c: Add device tree support Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 21:04:54 +0100 Message-ID: <5488A766.5070206@metafoo.de> References: <1418241578-17049-1-git-send-email-alexanders83@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp-out-218.synserver.de (smtp-out-218.synserver.de [212.40.185.218]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61D7B260426 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 21:05:00 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <1418241578-17049-1-git-send-email-alexanders83@web.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Alexander Stein , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Alexandre Belloni , Arnd Bergmann List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On 12/10/2014 08:59 PM, Alexander Stein wrote: > This adds device tree support for the AC97 controller. It uses the > soc-ac97link bindings, but actually only ac97-reset is used. > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein > --- > Changes in v2: > * It now uses the soc-ac97link bindings (partly) instead of defining its own. > This should ease the transition to ASoC once a new driver has been written. Partly? How do they differ? And why do they differ? The devicetree should describe the hardware, which I guess is the same in both cases. - Lars