From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: ming.lei@canonical.com, pl@kamp.de, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
stefanha@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] linux-aio: queue requests that cannot be submitted
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 13:52:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5489937C.9040904@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141211124956.GA23351@noname.redhat.com>
On 11/12/2014 13:49, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > - } else {
> > - i = ret;
> > + abort();
> > }
>
> abort() doesn't feel right here.
man doesn't suggest any error that can actually happen.
> > + QSIMPLEQ_INSERT_TAIL(&s->io_q.pending, laiocb, next);
> > + s->io_q.idx++;
> > + if (s->io_q.idx == (s->io_q.plugged ? MAX_QUEUED_IO : 1)) {
>
> More naturally written and more obviously correct as (!s->io_q,plugged ||
> s->io_q.idx >= MAX_QUEUED_IO). Which happens to be what the next patch
> converts it to, so I won't spend much time thinking about whether this
> version is actually right.
Sort of. If the queue is blocked due to -EAGAIN, I don't want to
io_submit every time an operation is queued, hence the ==. The next
patch adds !s->io_q.blocked, so it can use the more natural and indeed
more obvious expression.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-11 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-10 14:51 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] linux-aio: rewrite and simplify queuing code Paolo Bonzini
2014-12-10 14:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] linux-aio: queue requests that cannot be submitted Paolo Bonzini
2014-12-11 12:49 ` Kevin Wolf
2014-12-11 12:52 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2014-12-11 13:02 ` Kevin Wolf
2014-12-11 13:07 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-12-10 14:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] linux-aio: track whether the queue is blocked Paolo Bonzini
2014-12-10 14:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] linux-aio: rename LaioQueue idx field to "n" Paolo Bonzini
2014-12-10 14:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] linux-aio: simplify removal of completed iocbs from the list Paolo Bonzini
2014-12-11 13:13 ` Kevin Wolf
2014-12-11 13:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-12-11 13:22 ` Kevin Wolf
2014-12-11 14:07 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5489937C.9040904@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
--cc=pl@kamp.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.