From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jamal Hadi Salim Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RESEND] net: Do not call ndo_dflt_fdb_dump if ndo_fdb_dump is defined. Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 15:40:05 -0500 Message-ID: <548A0125.2030102@mojatatu.com> References: <54894850.5000603@cumulusnetworks.com> <7968540cd0768a770b0c8b29ce41a162.squirrel@poczta.wsisiz.edu.pl> <5489D53E.5010603@cumulusnetworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Vlad Yasevich To: Roopa Prabhu , Hubert Sokolowski Return-path: Received: from mail-ie0-f170.google.com ([209.85.223.170]:34935 "EHLO mail-ie0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758664AbaLKUkI (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Dec 2014 15:40:08 -0500 Received: by mail-ie0-f170.google.com with SMTP id rd18so5693637iec.1 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 12:40:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5489D53E.5010603@cumulusnetworks.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 12/11/14 12:32, Roopa Prabhu wrote: >> > Thanks. yes, that is a problem. And, this mac0 is not a bridge port > correct ?. > Aha. I think this is the key. It is NOT a bridge port. This is why i was explicit to ask for the commit log tests to be run. > But, for the same test case, when mac0 is a bridge port, does your patch > under review make both the entries go away for a bridge port ?. > (If i understand jamal correctly, this is his concern). I am interested to see the answer. More importantly I am hoping Vlad would wake up and say something. cheers, jamal