From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id BAF41E00992; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 00:22:20 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from dev.rtsoft.ru (mail.dev.rtsoft.ru [213.79.90.226]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E696AE0083A for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 00:22:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.5.130] (fw-int.dev.rtsoft.ru [192.168.1.70]) by dev.rtsoft.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF5AD41237; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 11:22:18 +0300 (MSK) Message-ID: <548AA5B2.1020209@dev.rtsoft.ru> Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 11:22:10 +0300 From: Nikita Yushchenko Organization: RTSoft Software Development Center User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Otavio Salvador , Fabio Estevam References: <5485A0E5.4030704@dev.rtsoft.ru> In-Reply-To: Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" , Gennady Kuznetsov Subject: Re: smarc-samx6i board support X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 08:22:20 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Otavio Thanks for you replies. I'm taking a time out to port my code to yocto master / 3.10.31 kernel, to prepare u-boot recipe and to address issues discussed in the mail. > Did you try to coordinate this effort with the vendor itself? Yes, we work with Kontron on "official" BSP. >> *) Support for hardware variations. > ... > If you ask me what would be the ideal solution I'd say it'd be to use > the recently added U-Boot SPL support (in U-Boot 2014.10 it has > support, use master from DENX for now work) as it would allow you to > use a single image and boot the Quad, Dual, DualLite and Solo variants > in a single image. Hmm... could you provide a bit more details on this? Does SPL stand for "secondary program loader"? How does this relate to having single image for different hw configs? >> *) Display selection >> ... > Take a look at how Boundary Devices has solved this. Their solution is > the most user-friendly one IMO. Do you mean what is described here - http://boundarydevices.com/configuring-i-mx6-machines-different-screens-nitrogen6x-sabre-lite/ ? I still do not understand how this correlates with configuring displays in device tree (just overrides it? then, what for to have display configuration in device tree at all?)... Nikita