From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S968132AbaLLQNa (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2014 11:13:30 -0500 Received: from mail-pa0-f51.google.com ([209.85.220.51]:45915 "EHLO mail-pa0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933792AbaLLQN3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2014 11:13:29 -0500 Message-ID: <548B1425.7090500@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 09:13:25 -0700 From: David Ahern User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Hunter , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo CC: Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Frederic Weisbecker , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , Paul Mackerras , Stephane Eranian Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 00/22] perf tools: Introduce an abstraction for Instruction Tracing References: <1418392089-5568-1-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1418392089-5568-1-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Adrian: On 12/12/14 6:47 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote: > Hi > > Here is V3 of some more preparatory patches for Intel PT > that introduce an abstraction for Instruction tracing. > This is an x86-Intel only feature correct? If that is the case then the code should be not compiled for other architectures. David