From: John Miller <johnmill@brandeis.edu>
To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: iptables DNAT algorithm -- another way?
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 18:55:21 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <548B8069.4020802@brandeis.edu> (raw)
Hi folks,
We're running a server that scan local systems for installed SSL
certificates. Problem is, the tool truly means local -- RFC1918 private
ranges only, please. Being a university, we have quite a few things
located in public IP space that aren't necessarily world-accessible
(development servers and the like).
My solution thus far has been to use DNAT to trick our scanning program
into thinking it's using local addresses.
iptables -t nat -A OUTPUT -d 172.16.x.y -j DNAT \
--to-destination 129.64.x.y
Trouble is that I want a direct correspondence: the third and fourth
octets need to be the same for source and destination. I can certainly
set ranges for initial and final destination address, but the NAT
algorithm picks the destination at random. Is there a way to accomplish
this in iptables? With another netfilter tool? I'd like to avoid running
#!/bin/sh
for third_octet in {0..255}; do
for fourth_octet in {0..255}; do
iptables -t nat -A OUTPUT \
-d 172.16.${third_octet}.${fourth_octet} -j DNAT \
--to-destination 129.64.${third_octet}.${fourth_octet}
done
done
and ending up with 2^16 separate iptables rules.
John
--
John Miller
Systems Engineer
Brandeis University
johnmill@brandeis.edu
next reply other threads:[~2014-12-12 23:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-12 23:55 John Miller [this message]
2014-12-13 0:50 ` iptables DNAT algorithm -- another way? Neal Murphy
2014-12-13 1:06 ` John Miller
2014-12-13 1:26 ` Neal Murphy
2014-12-13 9:21 ` Pascal Hambourg
2014-12-13 19:52 ` John Miller
2014-12-13 21:30 ` Pascal Hambourg
2014-12-14 3:30 ` John Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=548B8069.4020802@brandeis.edu \
--to=johnmill@brandeis.edu \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.