Re: [Qemu-devel] vfio-pci issues with multiple devices on the same root port

[Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>]

On 15.12.2014 16:11, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-12-13 at 21:43 +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
>> Am 12.12.2014 um 23:21 schrieb Alex Williamson:
>>> On Fri, 2014-12-12 at 22:38 +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> we have a Cisco UCS infrastructure where we have fnic Fibre-Channel Adapters that we expose to guests. The UCS
>>>> infrastruture allows to create virtual HBAs that can be exposed to a host so its possible to have quite a lot of them.
>>>>
>>>> We ran into a strange issue when we started having more than one vServer with a FibreChannel Adapter passed
>>>> thru with vfio-pci.
>>>>
>>>> When a hypervisor shuts down it the kernel sees the following error:
>>>>
>>>>   pcieport 0000:00:07.0: AER: Uncorrected (Non-Fatal) error received: id=0038
>>>>   pcieport 0000:00:07.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Uncorrected (Non-Fatal), type=Transaction Layer, id=0038(Receiver ID)
>>>>   pcieport 0000:00:07.0:   device [8086:340e] error status/mask=00200000/00100000
>>>>   pcieport 0000:00:07.0:    [21] Unknown Error Bit (First)
>>>>   pcieport 0000:00:07.0: broadcast error_detected message
>>>>   pcieport 0000:00:07.0: AER: Device recovery failed
>>>>
>>>> Bit 21 seems to be ACS Violation. And 0000:00:07.0 is the PCIE Root Port on that System.
>>>>
>>>> This wouldn't be a big problem, altough I would like to find out what the ACS Violation causes.
>>>>
>>>> The real problem is that all other vfio-pci cards on that root port get notified of this error and the connected vServers are suspended
>>>> with RUN_STATE_INTERNAL_ERROR.
>>>>
>>>> Any ideas to work around this other than hacking qemu to not register an error handler or modifying vfio_err_notifier_handler
>>>> to not suspend the vServer?
>>> You could set bit 21 in the AER uncorrected error mask register to avoid
>>> the root port signaling the error.  Is bit 21 already clear in the
>>> severity register to make this non-fatal?
>>>
>>>> Is it correct that all children of a root port are notified? Should qemu distinguish between fatal and non-fatal errors when
>>>> suspending a vServer?
>>> Yes, each child is notified.  QEMU only gets an eventfd signal, which is
>>> supposed to occur only for fatal errors.  I don't quite understand why
>>> this apparently non-fatal error is getting through.  The kernel-side
>>> VFIO code is where filtering of fatal vs non-fatal should occur.
>> Had a look at vfio-pci.c from master. I can't see where there is a filtering of fatal vs. non-fatal
> I'm under the impression that fatal vs non-fatal would be determined
> somewhere in the PCI layers and the driver would only be notified for
> uncorrected/fatal.  Are we missing that filtering?  Thanks,

As far as I am understand vfio_pci_aer_err_detected in drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
is called to recover potential recoverable errors and the driver decides if the
error was recoverable by the return code.

Peter